"At present, science has no satisfactory answer to the question of the origin of life on the earth.  Perhaps the appearance of life on the earth is a miracle.  Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but their choices are limited: either life was created on the earth by the will of a being outside the grasp of scientific understanding, or it evolved on our planet spontaneously, through chemical reactions occurring in nonliving matter lying on the surface of the planet.  The first theory places the question of the origin of life beyond the reach of scientific inquiry.  It is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science.   The second theory is also an act of faith.  The act of faith consists in assuming that the scientific view of the origin of life is correct, without having concrete evidence to support that belief."   (Robert Jastrow, Ph.D Theoretical Physics, "Until the Sun Dies," pp. 62-63, 1977)

"...the biological theorists don't know that Kant has analyzed why one cannot have an immanentist theory of evolution.  One can have empirical observation but no general theory of evolution because the sequence of forms is a mystery; it just is there and you cannot explain it by any theory.  The world cannot be explained.  It is a mythical problem, so you have a strong element of myth in the theory of evolution."  (Eric Voegelin, CW Vol. 33, The Drama of Humanity Conversations, III, Myth as Environment, p. 307)

Out of one side of their mouths, Progressive Darwinists tell us to believe that 'God is dead,' and with His death, immutable truth, universal morality,  original sin, and Nature's Law are dead as well, for these point to eternal verities: "It is a proposition of eternal verity that none can govern while He is despised." (American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828).   Yet out of the other side of their mouths, it's common for them to brazenly proclaim  that in reality, the evidence supporting Darwinism is overwhelming.  Some go so far as to claim that evolution is an established fact. 

Their claims however, are self-refuting, irrational, and based on a massive edifice of falsehood.   Here's why:

Both fact and evidence point back to unchanging truth and reality.  Truth is exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be.  History, as it unfolds, is a record of truth and reality; of what works and what does not work; of what is right and true and of what is not.  The long-term collective memory of this unfolding historic knowledge  is common sense.

Truth, as recorded over and over by history shows that the seed of wheat has never brought forth anything but wheat.  We all know this is true; it is common knowledge.  Never once in our long history has the seed of wheat brought forth tomatoes, or something never before seen.  Yet these miraculous events  ought to have happened at least once if evolution is true.

History records the cyclical repetition of the four seasons, year after year, down through the long history of mankind.  History likewise records that the return of Spring is always, without fail, accompanied by the return of birds.  Each kind pairs off,  builds nests peculiar to its own kind, and procreates.  Not one time has history recorded the absence of Spring nor a robin mating with a bluebird or a frog.  Nor has history ever reported a nest adorned with a porch, TV antenna, or swimming pool.   Why not?   Because just as the seasons must repeat cyclically, birds must likewise do what birds do.  They possess no free will, hence must do as instinct dictates.  Yet if evolution is true, one might reasonably expect to hear of extraordinary displacements  upsetting the rhythm and pattern of the four seasons as well as to see evolved bird/frogs (brogs?)  nesting in terraced penthouse nests.

Refusal to anchor the order in the Creator declares Stanly L. Jaki, cannot "but leave one with the fearful prospect of a radically random state of affairs.  There stones would not regularly fall, but just as likely hang in mid-air or take off unexpectedly in any direction.  There it would be most unlikely that the hatching of a chicken egg would yield a chick.  There a flower would perpetuate its own kind only as an exceptional case.  In other words, in a world severed from its Creator, lawfulness would be the miracle, that is, a most unexpected event."   (Miracles and Physics, p. 29-30) 

Truth is clearly on display when mating season arrives and  each kind procreates, as they must.   Anyone who spends time around animals, such as farmers , ranchers, and hunters  knows this to be true.   Never once has history recorded lions, cattle, deer, or horses, for example, refusing to procreate.  Just as with birds, these animals lack free will and have no choice but to reproduce as instinct dictates.  No, it's only mankind who can freely choose to either  procreate or not; to nurture and love babies or to sacrificially kill them on behalf of  the great god Hedon (sexual liberation), Mammon, 'saving Gaia', or some such pretext.

Truth says that over the long course of history, not once have stallions deserted their mares in order to 'go gay.'  Nor has history ever witnessed even once, a titmouse dying its crest orange or purple nor a monkey putting rings through its nose, tongue, or naval.  Truth reveals that only man possesses the free will to choose to pierce his body and do things contrary to nature, like 'coming out gay.'   

Despite that truth can be clearly known by reason, Progressive evolutionists willfully disbelieve what they cannot help but know is true--- that mankind is only of two sexes and has free will, for instance.

"The  first dogma which I came to disbelieve was that of free will..."  Bertrand Russell, 1872-1970

"Everything, including that which happens in our brains, depends on these and only these: A set of fixed, deterministic laws.  A purely random set of accidents."  Marvin Minsky, artificial intelligence guru

"We are descended from robots; and composed of robots, and all the intentionality we enjoy is derived from the more fundamental intentionality of these billions of crude intentional systems."  Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds

The Darwinian mythos, observed C.S. Lewis,  is devised not to seek truth but to keep God out:

"More disquieting still is Professor D.M.S. Watson's defense.  "Evolution itself," he wrote, "is accepted by zoologists not because it has been observed to occur or...can be proved by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible."  Has it come to that? Does the whole vast structure of modern naturalism depend  not on positive evidence but simply on an a priori metaphysical prejudice.  Was it devised not to get in facts but to keep out God?"  (CS Lewis, The Oxford Socratic Club, 1944)

Death of America

Described by Alexis de Tocqueville as the freest most enlightened civilization in history, America was firmly founded on Judeo-Christian principles.   John Adams (1735-1862), signer of the Declaration of Independence, main author of the Constitution of Massachusetts in 1780, Vice-President under George Washington, and 2nd President of the United States, concurs:

"The general principles on which the Fathers achieved independence, were...the general Principles of Christianity...(1813, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson) Religion and Virtue are the only foundations...of republicanism and of all free government..." (http://summit.org/)

As early as 1896 however, Progressive intellectuals had begun the work of demolishing America's founding worldview.  Liberal theologian Walter Rauschenbusch, leader of the Social Gospel movement, used  the pulpit to preach a pantheistic,  anti-individual liberty, anti-truth  message.  "Individualism means tyranny," sermonized Rauschenbusch,  by which he meant that 'oneness' with nature (pantheism) brings salvation through a divinized God-State controlled by Progressive  'god men.'  In this morally inverted view, moral good is submission to Progressive dictates while moral evil is dissent against it.   

This morally-demented nonsense,  writes Jonah Goldberg in his book "Liberal Fascism", laid the groundwork for the equally morally insane preachments proclaimed decades later by Marxist Frankfurt School intellectuals such as Herbert Marcuse in the 1960s---'oppressive freedom,'  'repressive tolerance,' 'defensive violence.'  (Liberal Fascism, p. 86-87)

By the time of Pres. Woodrow Wilson's regime, Progressive intellectuals  had speculatively replaced the living Creator with a  pantheistic 'ineffable force' that works its black-magic  'inversion of morality and reality'  through Darwinian evolution-magic.   By waving the wizard's wand of evolution-magic over our Constitution---presto!---it 'came to life,' and now 'lives, breathes, and evolves.'  Having unshackled themselves from universal moral law Progressives saw themselves as possessing a divine writ from their divinized ineffable force of nature (spoken of in public as God)  for organized cruelty, immorality, lying, power-grabbing, and for furthering their work of destroying America's worldview foundations.   Those who stood in the way of 'progress,' that is, the defenders of America's founding worldview  and Constitutional Republic, were demonized as the 'other,' because says Goldberg, "they were by their very existence blocking the will to power that gave the mob and the avante garde...their reason for existence."  (p. 85)

The world's first totalitarian regime was not Soviet Russia nor Italy under Mussolini.  Neither was it Hitler's Nazi  Germany.  No, it was  Progressive Fascist America under the Wilson regime, reveals Goldberg.    Like Mussolini and Hitler who had jack-booted activist-enforcers  at their beck and call, so too did Wilson.   In Italy they were called Fascists.   In Germany they were called National Socialists.   In America, Wilson's badge-carrying goons were called progressives.    Nothing has changed, for today, Obama's jack-booted goon  squad activists are called progressives. 

Viewing themselves as enlightened, scientific, and elite,  the West's Progressives, noted Whittaker Chambers, had "rejected the religious roots" of its own civilization for a "new order of beliefs" of which Communism was "one logical expression."  (George H. Nash, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America, p. 253) 

Though differing in degree, Progressive Liberalism nevertheless infects both right (RINOS, for example) and left and is merely the continuation of the 20th century's  genocidal totalitarian irreligion.    Their common  foundation:  some form of the Darwinian mythos disguised as science.  

 Darwinism  denies the existence of the transcendent Permanent Things that,  grounded in unchanging truth and reality,  comprise this nation's founding worldview and give rise to our inalienable individual rights and enduring principles of liberty:  our living Creator, Nature's Law, immutable truth, universal moral law,  virtue,  the individual thinker and 'choice-maker' made in the spiritual image of God, and even the two sexes, male and female.  Progressive evolutionism tells us to believe  that everything came into being by chance---accidentally, without meaning, purpose, or design-- from nonliving matter.    Hence, since man is an accidental emergence from 'nothing', then he is in the image of 'nothing'.   'Nothing' has no free will, nor should man.  'Nothing' owns nothing, nor should man.  And since 'nothing' is neither male nor female, then neither should man be, rather man ought to be 'gay,' another word for polymorphously perverse androgyny.     

When all men have finally submitted to being ruthlessly pounded down into nothingness, egalitarianism (sameness),  social justice and fairness will have been achieved and the immoralists Eden (sinners paradise)---hell on earth--has arrived.

Additionally, we are conditioned to believe that everything  remains in continuous movement as it readies itself for the next quantum leap in evolution.  By extension of this  superstitious illogic, evidence is merely an illusion, for  not only is continuous motion  anathema to truth, fact, and reality, but these verities along with all activity of the mind (thought, imagination, memory, dreams)  are of the immaterial (metaphysical) realm, which Darwinism claims does not exist.   Hence the monstrously imbecilic claims made by willfully ignorant Darwinists regarding evidence, fact, and reality in support of evolution refutes evolution's main claim, that truth and reality cannot and do not exist.  The foolish King not only has no clothes, but he has no mind!

How can this self-contradictory conundrum be explained?

Massively egoistic Progressive  irreligionists immediately respond, "Sinless man is the measure of all things.  Put your faith in him!"

But what does history record?  It relates that in addition to seeing man choose to do things contrary to nature, it says that since the dawn of history, it has heard man tell lies over  and over and over.  Man, records history, lies to himself, and he lies to others. 

"I do not want to believe in God," confessed Dr. George Wald, Nobel Prize winner and professor emeritus of biology at Harvard University.  "Therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution"  Wald admitted to Scientific American magazine.

"I suppose the reason we leaped at the origin of species was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores," confessed Sir Julian Huxley, former president of UNESCO and grandson of Darwin's colleague Thomas Huxley.

"We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom," concurred his brother, the late Aldous Huxley.

Writing to his  friend and colleague Charles Lyell, Charles Darwin baldly confessed, "Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have devoted myself to a phantasy."

Darwinism---the Lie

In a letter to a friend, C.S. Lewis writes that he is right in "regarding (evolution) as the central and radical lie in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives..." However, Lewis astutely observes, "it is not so much your arguments against it as the fanatical and twisted attitudes of its defenders." (Letter to Bernard Acworth, Spt. 13, 1951)

Power Corrupts, Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

"We have to use any ruse, dodge, trick, cunning, unlawful method, concealment, and veiling of the truth."   V.I. Lenin, progressive  anti-hero

Today  our Constitutional Republic, called the 'shining city on a hill' by Ronald Reagan, is on a dangerous fast-track to totalitarian socialism.   What yet remains of our founding worldview and Constitutional Republic is rapidly suffocating and dying under an ever-expanding interlocking matrix of lies, from small lies to Big Lies, all of which are defended by  the 'fanatical and twisted' tellers of them---immoralist Progressive power-grabbers at every level of government  and society who willfully disbelieve what they cannot help but know to be true.     As frightful and evil as this prospect is, there is more.    The Progressive dream of utopia is fueled by Gnostic Manichaeism.   In this demonically-occluded view, Progressive believers are 'sinless and good' while the 'others' (Conservatives, the Right, all defenders of American tradition) are automatically evil.   Ridding the world of evil becomes a matter of purging it of both the evil others and utterly destroying Western civilization.   Toward this goal, Progressives have forged an unholy alliance with Islam.  Jamie Glazov writes, "Upon the foundation of their hatred for the United States, its members have forged their alliance with radical Islam, whose wellspring of anti-American hatred runs just as deep.   In word and deed, both of these allies make it plain that they consider everything about Western civilization to be evil and unworthy of preservation; that they wish to see freedom and individual rights crushed by any means necessary, including violent revolution."  (United in Hate, pp. xx-xxi)      

What sort of people are immoralists?  In the words of Alexis de' Tocqueville they are "they who obey the dictates of their passion..."  In other words, they obey everything from  virulently inflated narcissism (god man megalomania, psychopathology) and lust for power  to sexually perverted lusts, covetousness, gluttony, hatred, resentment, and envy---all  fueled by will to power.    In this light, political correctness, multiculturalism, hate crime laws and speech codes are seen for what they are: anti-social pathologies  translated into politics and perverted law.

John Adams prescient warning speaks to our own time:

" We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions  unbridled by morality and religion...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.  It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." (1798)"

The Road Home

C.E.M. Joad, a 20th century progressive philosopher, spent most of his life proclaiming his distaste for the great I AM, the doctrine of Original Sin,  and the transcendent Permanent Things.    As a Progressive he wholeheartedly embraced revolutionary doctrine and the necessity for socialism.   It was the genocide, catastrophic destruction, and massive suffering unleashed by application of Progressive ideas  under direction of sinless men unshackled from God and moral law that led to Joad's  eventual rejection of Progressivism.  In a book entitled The Recovery of Belief, Joad documented his transfer of allegiance from Progressivism and evolution back to Christianity, special creation and the Permanent Things that made this nation the freest most enlightened nation in the history of the world.

Joad wisely repented of the dark "dream of destroying the world...and building a utopia on its ashes---that has shaped and represented the modern progressive movement." (Jamie Glazov, United in Hate, p. 2)

Not so Lenin.  Only after Russia flowed with the blood of millions of people and his hands were darkly red with their blood would he finally admit:

"I committed a great error.  My nightmare is to have the feeling that I'm lost in an ocean of blood from the innumerable victims.  It is too late to return.  To save our country, Russia, we would have needed men like Francis of Assisi..." (Richard Wurmbrand, Marx and Satan, p. 50)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2009

Additional Sources:

Darwin Day in America, John G. West

The Spiritual Brain, Mario Beauregard, Ph.D. & Denyse O'Leary

Why Academics Embrace Evolution, Marylou Barry, WND, Apr. 27, 2009

Permanent Things, Andrew Tadie & Michael MacDonald

The Deadliest Monster, J.F. Baldwin

Linda is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.  Linda is a team member of Grassfire, New Media Alliance, and MoveOff.

In recent times, America has been experiencing an explosion of neo-pagan movements in concert with a relentless assault on truth, reality, first principles, universal moral law, and the created order of being---the two sexes (male and female) for example.  These movements interface with mystical, quasi-Buddhist, occult Gnostic, and other ‘blood and soil’ notions:  New Age cults, transcendental meditation, Wicca, goddess worship, ‘gay’ shamanism, reincarnation, Luciferian Theosophy, the Great Apes  Project and all other animal rights agendas, Gaia worship, deep ecology, channeling and other such notions.  All are types of pantheism, which stress in one way or another that mankind is ‘one with’ nature (or the cosmos or dialectical matter) and should therefore make obeisance to it as Sovereign.

 In his penetrating analysis of the organized Left, M. Stanton Evans author of ‘The Theme is Freedom: Religion, Politics, and the American Tradition, observes that it is only against the background of neo-paganism that the bizarre ‘isms’ of Leftist politics come into focus. The common feature of all these movements---naturalism, materialism, sexism, multiculturalism, determinism, economic determinism, heteronormativism, and patriarchalism for instance, is that they view irrational nature itself as ultimate and sovereign.   In other words, they make a god of irrational nature, which is precisely why Al Gore is synonymous with Gaia, global warming, and carbon footprints, and the Left in general is so very ‘green.’  “Much of it, indeed,” Evans continues, “is pantheism or other nature-worship, dressed up as secularism or science.”     Darwinian evolution, says Evans, is the “most influential case in point (as it) explicitly replaces (or identifies) God with physical nature, and in some versions even attributes to nature, or some agency within it, ineffable designs.”  (The Theme is Freedom, p. 122)

 For almost one-hundred years, the Left has been busily engaged in stealthily undermining and gutting our founding documents and America’s social, political, legal, and cultural infrastructures. Toward this end, they’ve managed to marginalize the Declaration of Independence—the charter document—and to cleverly infiltrate new and alien meaning into our Constitution. Whereas originally, the individual’s right to liberty was viewed as God-given---thus fixed and unchanging---God has been declared dead and subsequently replaced by a quasi-divine State, while group privileges are increasingly sweeping away individual rights.   And where each and every human life possesses an ‘inalienable right to life’ was held as an immutable truth and a universal moral good, the ‘enlightened’ politically correct view holds that truth and morality are irrelevant and human life is without value, dignity, or purpose.  Taking the place of our inalienable right to life is politically correct choice.  In reality, choice is an elitist eugenics mentality in disguise, hence it views procreation of undesirables---such as the common man---as bad, therefore all population control schemes such as euthanasia, abortion, and the abomination called partial birth abortion---which is tantamount to infanticide---are ‘good.’  

However, despite these and the Left’s many other successful changes toward the transvaluation or total inversion of America’s traditional cultural, social, political, and legal order,  our Second Amendment rights  remain a primary concern to the totalitarian ambitions of the organized Left.

In the face of these ominous signs of impending serfdom, there are---very incredibly— those who have expressed to me their fear that should the Left ever succeed in fully taking over our country they will take our x-boxes away from us.

Fear not, they don’t want our x-boxes. Nor do they covet our mind-and-soul destroying entertainment.

What they want are our guns, for a weaponless people are a helpless people. What Leftists definitely don’t want are our x-boxes, MTV, porn, drugs, sado-masochistic Jerry Springer programs, street-walker clothes, and demonically-occluded rap, for these things are modernity’s versions of yesterday’s Roman ‘bread and circuses.’   

Various Leftists and their ilk predicted long ago that they and an interconnected network of accomplices throughout academia, the entertainment world, government, and elsewhere, would bring about the fall of the West by way of a ‘long walk through the culture.’  A diabolically conceived ‘walk’ that would slowly invert our traditional order by disarming, dumbing-down, and putting Westerners ‘to sleep’ (enslaving them) through immorality: ‘’sex, drugs, and rock ‘n roll.”  The unwary sleepers, it was confidently foretold, would never dream that they would one day awaken to a nightmare world of slavery.

Over the course of many years those predictions have been coming true. For today, far too many Americans are fast becoming an immoral, narcissistic people addicted to instant gratification; an infantilized people whose ongoing mind-conditioning comes by way of a warped, pornographic, propaganda-spewing media and entertainment. And while Americans have been sleeping, our universities and schools have become transmission belts for the proselytizing of socialism, political correctness, open-borders, New Age pantheism, sexual confusion and androgyny, one world universalism, and hate:  hate-whitey, hate-Conservatives, hate-America, hate truth, hate Boy Scouts, hate history, hate free markets, hate straight males, hate-tradition, hate-morality, and hate the Biblical God.

As truth, common sense, morality, and knowledge of our founding worldview die, the American mind shuts down in tandem, thereby allowing the icecap of a new ‘green’ totalitarianism to relentlessly advance across our nation snuffing out the light of liberty and all things good.  Under its oppressive weight, America is being crushed downward into a dark abyss of pagan superstition, where at the urging of the Left’s demonic mendacity, 2+2 becomes 5, being bad is cool, but doing evil is much more gratifying.

Our founders long ago warned Americans that only a God-fearing, informed, and virtuous people can remain a free people, for these practices lend themselves to self-determination (impulse-control) and the cultivation of higher reason and logic, hence to individual liberty and our form of self-government.  In the words of Patrick Henry---Christian patriot, governor of Virginia, revolutionary general, “The Voice of Liberty,’ and signer of the U.S. Constitution:

“The great pillars of all government and of social life (are) virtue, morality, and religion.  This is the armor, my friend, and this alone, that renders us invincible.”

 Ignorance, narcissism, and the giving in to base impulses and passions on the other hand, leads to lack of impulse-control (determinism) and the downward spiraling consequences of dependency, lying, cheating, crime, chaos, anarchy, and eventually slavery.  Tragically, and of great consequence to the continuance of individual liberty, all too many Americans today are materialistic, drug-using, infantilized, violence-prone, obscenity-spewing, sex-obsessed people, and the name Jesus Christ is for many of these---and particularly for the Left’s ‘self-anointed’---- the obscenity of choice.   In 1909, Reverend Francis Grimke warned of the perils of moral corruption.  He said:

“If the time ever comes when we shall go to pieces, it will…be…from inward corruption----from the disregard of right principles…”  (Equality of Right for all Citizens, Black and White Alike)

As we watch and wait in trepidation, wondering if our fellow Americans will be so foolish as to elect the seductive, charismatic Messiah Obama—the most Progressive Leftist in Congress—-we need to realize that our greatest enemy is often ourselves. For when we allow ourselves to fall down the slippery slopes of moral corruption, ignorance, dependency, and apathy we fall right into slavery, both spiritual and physical. Our own freely chosen follies and conceits---in concert with a willingness to transgress---will be the downfall of our individual liberties, self-government, and a free America.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2008

 http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Founding quotes from Wallbuilders

About Linda: Linda is the author of numerous published essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.  Linda is a member of the New Media Alliance and the MoveOff alliance.

For over eighty-five years, America has been incrementally conquered by the same madness-inducing demon of hatred and violence that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany, and Italy.  Rabbi Aryeh Spiro concurs, “There is a madness in today’s liberal thinking.  It insists on policies that tie our hands to defend ourselves while given free reign to the jihadists intent on killing us.  It is dangerous because it is becoming the law, and thinking of the land in the western world.  (Liberal Madness is Deadly, www.caucusforamerica.com (1/24/08)

This demon is embodied in “enlightened” Liberals and the West’s transnational “elite,” both of which are deeply infected by materialistic Communism (Cultural Marxism) and the delusion that the true enemy of America is always on the Right.  Having rejected God and the religious heritage of our civilization, they embrace instead a new order of beliefs of which Communism and Socialism are logical expressions.  A new world order is what they seek, but in order that it can emerge, the existing culture must be completely destroyed.

And what is Communism?  Using the former Soviet Union as an example, Frank Meyers describes it as, “The state form taken by a materialist faith determined to rule the world.”    Communism or scientific materialism is “the final synthesis of all heretical tendencies that have pervaded Western civilization for many centuries.”  It is materialist scientism, of which, “Communism is the culminating hubris of the Promethean man who reaches out for the world and means to remake creation.  It is scientism gone political.” (The Conservative Intellectual Movement, pp. 251-252)

We are All Materialists Now

“An age of science is necessarily an age of materialism,” declared Hugh Elliot early last century, “Ours is a scientific age, and it may be said with truth that we are all materialists now.”  (Darwin Day in America, John G. West, xiv)

 Materialist faith, or scientific materialism, has virtually displaced America’s founding Judeo-Christian worldview with the result that materialism is now the operative assumption for much of our government, culture, politics, law, etc.  Materialist operatives now control every public institution in the United States.  According to the inner logic of materialist faith, “we the people” are nothing but socially-constructed atomized robots which can presumably be deconstructed and melted into an atomized mass.  Toward both this goal and to raise up an army of street thugs who will destroy our culture, materialist change-agents use our education system to subvert and convert the minds of our youth.  Should they succeed in thoroughly corrupting them and in turning their hearts to hate, this generation of children may become the next Khmer Rouge, who at Pol Pot’s order murdered nearly two-million people, including their own families.

What is Materialism?

As Robert Jastrow (b. 1925), recipient of NASA’s Medal for Exceptional Studies explains, there are only two possible explanations for the origin of life:  evolution and creation.

“…science has no…answer to the question of the origin of life on earth.  Perhaps (life) is a miracle.  Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but their choices are limited:  either life was created…by the will of a being outside…scientific understanding, or it evolved…spontaneously through chemical reactions…in nonliving matter…The first theory…is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science.   The second theory is also an act of faith (which assumes) that the scientific view…is correct, without having concrete evidence to support that belief.”  (Until the Sun Dies, Jastrow, 1977, pp. 62-63)

America is founded on the Judeo-Christian creation model.   Materialist faith rises or falls on the assumptions of metaphysical materialism and evolution.         

Materialism belongs to the family of Naturalism, which refers to the view that nature (or matter) is the Ultimate Substance of which the universe and all life are made, thus “all is one.”   C. S. Lewis describes naturalism as a box with its top sealed tightly closed in order to keep out God and the supernatural realm.  The ancient Ionians, Babylonians, Egyptians, and Aztecs were, for example, naturalists.  In this view there is but one realm (the material or natural) as opposed to Judeo-Christianity’s creation model with its two interacting realms: natural and supernatural.

There are two basic kinds of Naturalism:  materialism (i.e., Communism) and pantheism (i.e., Nazism and New Age Spiritual Communism).  The two kinds differ chiefly about whether the First Cause or Absolute Substance is nonliving, non-intelligence bearing matter or an unknowing, unknowable, amoral mind.  However, both kinds are united by their rejection of the transcendent, personal God and the supernatural realm and by their acceptance of some form of evolution, which serves as an impersonal, mechanical process of development. 

Birth of Scientific Materialism: A Brief Historical Overview

As will be shown by the following overview, scientific materialism is not founded on empirical science, as has been its deceptive claim, but rather on metaphysics.

In the main, modern materialism originated in the metaphysics of the ancient Ionians and Stoics during the sixth century BC.  However, it was the Atomists (Leucippus/Democritus, 460-357 BC; Epicurus, 342-270 BC; and Lucretius, 96-55 BC) who methodically developed materialism.

Forged in a furnace of narcissism, envy, and contempt, Atomism was from its inception an antihuman abomination which in later years, would attract those who enjoy the control and domination of others.   Atomism set all things in ceaseless, purposeless motion by reducing everything---including man, his soul, and even his thoughts---to mindless atoms perpetually colliding with each other in a void.  Man was reduced to a soulless, mindless machine that could only ‘see’ a tree because the tree emitted atoms which entered machine-man’s eyes and implanted themselves onto his brain.  This view has changed very little:

“We are descended from robots, and composed of robots…”   --Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds

Plato and Aristotle were the most forceful and compelling critics of Atomism.  In Book X of Laws, Plato indicts the Atomists for reversing the natural order, which they did by placing dead matter before Nous (mind/soul), and for the reductionism that sets everything in motion and reduces man to a machine.  Plato foresees only misery, social disintegration and ultimately, “the ruin of both states and families” should Atomism become the accepted view.

Though Christianity reared a mighty barrier against Atomism, it would be resurrected--- along with the hylozoism of the Ionians and Stoics---during the Renaissance by among others, pantheist Giordano Bruno and the heretic Paracelsus, an alchemist described by C.S. Lewis as a magician in his book, The Abolition of Man.   

Hylozoism (Greek hyle=nature; zoe-life) is the doctrine according to which all of nature’s bodies (i.e., sun, earth, moon, trees, man) possess life, mind, soul, and even divinity.   By infusing Atomism with Ionian hylozoism, what might be called materialzoism was invented by Bruno, Paracelsus, and others.   In short, dead matter was not just brought to life but deified.

The Franco-Germanic Enlightenment

With “God dead” and the source of man’s humanity (mind/soul) expropriated by materialists and conferred upon “dead matter,” a rush to discover the key that unlocks the mystery to life and mind was ignited which in later years unleashed unspeakable evil.  For in believing that without a doubt, they now possessed the gnosis (secret knowledge) to not only design a utopia but create a New Man with a reprogrammed mind and conscience, Nazi and Soviet scientists performed sadistic experiments on living human beings.  It was of these later scientific materialists that C.S. Lewis wrote his book, “The Abolition of Man.”  Even now, wrote Lewis, the process to “abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats (and) Fascists.”  The methods, said Lewis, may at first differ in brutality.  But “enlightened” materialists from scientists to philosophers to academe and to political leaders mean, in the long run, “Just the same as the Nazis…”  The West and America are to be destroyed and “mankind to be cut out in some fresh shape at the will” of scientific materialists who Lewis calls the Conditioners and Innovators.  These people, noted Lewis, are no longer men, for they have stepped out into the void. 

 Among the horde of Prometheans who set out to discover the animating-power of machine-man was Giovanni Aldini, who performed macabre experiments on decapitated oxes, horses, lambs, and---once he had overcome his repugnance, on humans.  For his experiments, he procured the freshest specimens possible by placing himself “under the scaffold, near the axe of justice…”  Believing that some type of electricity was the source of machine-mans animation, Aldini applied electricity to various parts of decapitated human heads.  This produced “the most horrid grimaces (but the) action of the eyelids was exceedingly striking.”  Aldini rationalized his repugnant experiments by saying that only the “unenlightened part of mankind (will be) apt to entertain a prejudice…”  (Darwin Day in America, p. 15)

Yet more power-crazed Prometheans emerged.  Julien de la Mettrie (1709-51), Paul Henri Thiery, and Baron D’Holbach (1723-89) all agreed that the mind is the property of dead matter and man nothing but a machine.  La Mettrie speculated that machine-mans rational life is entirely determined by physical causes that run the gamut from raw meat, to climate, blood circulation, and gender.  Genetic inheritance, posits la Mettrie, causes machine-man to commit crime.  This view casts parents into the role of “first cause” and would later manifest itself in the belief that State ‘experts,’  or Hillary’s “village” experts should have control of children.   (ibid, pp. 16-18)

Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) viewed scientific materialism as not only the pursuit of God-like omniscience but of the Holy Grail itself---power to create a New Man.   If an intelligence could grasp “at a given instant…all the forces by which nature is animated” proclaimed Laplace, it could devise a mathematical formula that would predict everything that would ever happen, and “nothing would be uncertain, and the future, like the past, would be open to its eyes.”  Scientists should reduce everything in the universe to mechanical laws that could be expressed in terms of mathematics, advised Laplace, for the promise of such knowledge was incredible power…even over life and mind itself.  (ibid, p. 20)

Herbert Spencer, Fechner, Lotze, Wundt, and pantheist Ernst Haeckel, inventer of the scientism dictum---ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny---all agreed that life and mind are properties of dead matter.  Haeckel moreover imagined ether to be the primitive life-making substance which, as was the case with the primitive fire of the Stoics, changed one part of itself into inert mass while the other part became the active principle, spirit.  Today, many scientists routinely resort to Haeckel’s postulate without ever inquiring into its pantheist implications.

Haeckel would later write, “Pantheism teaches that God and the world are one…pantheism is…an advanced conception of nature (and) a polite form of atheism.”  The truth of pantheism, confessed Haeckel, “lies in its destruction of the dualist antithesis of God…”  The godless world system being constructed, said Haeckel, “substantially agrees with the monism or pantheism of the modern scientist.”  (Monism, Ernst Haeckel, www.pantheist.net/)

During the century to follow, Charles Darwin (1809-82) would help spread materialism to the masses.   As Stephen Jay Gould argues, “Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature, “and “the ground of all existence; mind, spirit, and God (are reduced to) neural complexity.” (ibid, p. 41)

According to Darwin, natural selection and the laws of heredity acting on matter produced mind, morality, and civilization.  By describing how deified natural mechanisms caused the complexity of life to emerge from deified matter, Darwin helped transform materialism from a fantastically bizarre tale told by power-mad Prometheans on the fringe of society to a hallowed scientism principle enshrined and worshipped by modern scientism and ‘enlightened’ Westerners.

It was during this time that Social Darwinism, Progressivism, Socialism, Communism (Cultural Marxism, New Left), Nazism, and Secular Humanism were developed out of metaphysical materialism.  Classical Liberalism on the other hand, was subverted and corrupted by the materialist faith into what is now known as modern Liberalism.  Of these, Communism (Marx and Engel’s dialectical materialism), is considered to be the most highly developed philosophy of materialism.  It rests on three fundamental metaphysical presuppositions:

1.      Deified Matter:  The Ultimate Substance which, though non-living, non-intelligent, and non-conscious, nevertheless somehow possesses the emergent properties of life, mind, consciousness, and soul.

2.      Evolution: Since Marxist dialectic requires a theory with clashes (thesis and antithesis) and leaps (synthesis), Marxists have all but abandoned Darwinism and instead have embraced punctuated equilibrium. “Many people confound dialectic with the theory of evolution,” noted G. Plekhanov. ”Dialectic is, in fact, a theory of evolution.  But it differs profoundly from the vulgar (Darwinian) theory of evolution.” (Fundamental Problems of Marxism, 1929, p. 145)

3.      Spontaneous Generation: An offshoot of specifically Darwinian thought accepted unreservedly by Marxists as their dialectic requires a strictly materialist explanation for the origin of life from dead matter.  In the words of M.A. Leonov:  “Marxist philosophical materialism remains beyond all doubt that at some time or other in the remote past, life must have arisen from non-living matter.” (Outline of Dialectical Materialism, 1948, p. 494)

In a modified version of the Stoic conception of the earth as a living organism possessed of its own soul, neo-pantheist dialectical materialism declares that earth is “one entire organism…its organs the various races and nations of men.”  Not only is the earth alive and evolving upward on evolution’s magical escalator, but so too are history and society, for they also are living entities in a continuous state of motion.  And man?  In a modified conception of Atomism’s extremely dehumanizing view of man, dialectical materialism states that man is nothing but “a colonial aggregation of cells,” and to “consider him an individual would be an error.”  Man---the aggregate of cells--- is nothing but an extension of society, history, and earth.  (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Chapter II: The Constitution of Man as a Political Organism)

Death of America?

 Modern materialist states began by rejecting God and denying objective standards of right and wrong.  They threw out sanctity of life and demonically reduced man to matter in motion.   The end case, in every instance, was to place absolute power over  “atomized masses” into the hands of psychopaths and autocratic states to be wielded without restraint or mercy.  

Of all religions, the materialist faith has been by far the bloodiest.  In his book, Death by Government, R.J. Rummel comprehensively details the roughly 170 million people murdered by materialist governments during the 20th century.  From 1917 to its collapse in 1991, the Soviet Union liquidated about 62 million.  During Mao Tse-tung’s reign, 35,236,000 were murdered.  Hitler’s Nazi’s killed 21 million.    Even at its mildest, as is thus far the case here in America, there is a steady level of confiscation, corruption, fraud, and stifling of freedoms and free speech.  For the first time ever, Americans are afraid of saying certain words.  Parents fear disciplining their own children.  More ominously, materialists in control of America (i.e., ACLU, activist judges) have rejected God and thrown out both sanctity of life and objective standards.  “We the people” have been reduced to atomized beings.   Totalitarianism and genocide loom just over our horizon.

As early as 1926, President Calvin Coolidge was aware of and deeply concerned by the insidious spread scientific materialism in America.  As he knew, Americans are free only because of the Judeo-Christian foundation laid by the country’s founders.  In a speech he delivered in Philadelphia, July 5, 1926 to commemorate the 150^th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Coolidge tried to call American’s back to their Judeo-Christian heritage.  He told Americans that the Declaration’s principles of liberty arise from man’s God-given inalienable rights.  And these are found, said Coolidge, “in the texts, the sermons, and the writings of the early colonial clergy…”  The clergy preached equality “because they believed in the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.”  Sanctity of life, the right to self-defense, and all the rest of our individual liberties were justified “by the text that we are all created in the divine image, all partakers of the divine spirit.”  God’s children therefore, have no “superiors;” there are no modern-day “divine rights kings” who possess “any right to rule…over them.”  Americans are free to choose their own leaders.

The Declaration, continued Coolidge, is “a great spiritual document.”  Its principles are not material but spiritual.  “Equality, liberty, popular sovereignty, the rights of man---these are not elements we can see and touch.  They are ideals (whose) source and roots (are) in religious convictions.  They belong to the unseen world.”

President Coolidge cautioned Americans that, “unless the faith of the Americans in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration will perish.  We can not continue to enjoy the result if we abandon the cause.”

Coolidge ended his speech with a stark warning, “We must not sink into a pagan materialism…”   (Back Fired, William Federer, pp. 269-271)

Yet, believing they are “enlightened” and “scientific,” maddened Liberals and Transnational “elites” are leading America over the Gadarene Cliff.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2008                                                                    PatriotsandLiberty.com/  http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Additional Sources:

Red Sea of Academe?  Walter Williams, Washington Times, 8/28/06 

Materialism, newadvent.org/

Hylozoism, newadvent.org/

Linda is the author of numerous published essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.  Linda is a member of the MoveOff organization and a New Media Alliance member.                                                                                                                                     

In addition to original Darwinism, today there are two other versions of evolutionary theory: punctuated equilibrium and neo-Darwinism, a revamped version of the original Darwinism. No matter the variant though, evolution serves as the creation myth for the theological and philosophical worldview of Evolutionary Humanism (Naturalism).

“Evolution is a religion,” declared evolutionary Humanist Michael Ruse. “This was true of evolution in the beginning and it is true still today…One of the most popular books of the era was ‘Religion Without Revelation,’ by Julian Huxley, grandson of Thomas Huxley…As always evolution was doing everything expected of religion and more.” (National Post, Canadian Edition, 5/13/2000)

“Humanism is a philosophical, religious, and moral point of view.” (Humanist Manifestos I & II, 1980, Introduction, Paul Kurtz)

The primary denominations of Evolutionary Humanism are Cultural Marxism/Communism, Secular Humanism, Postmodernism, and Spiritual Communism. The offshoots of these are among others, New Age/green environmentalism/Gaia, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, multiculturalism, and atheism. Individually and collectively, these are modernized versions of pre-Biblical naturalism (paganism).

All worldviews begin with a religious declaration. The Biblical worldview begins with, “In the beginning God…” Cosmic Humanism begins, “In the beginning Divine Matter.”

Communism, Postmodernism, and Secular Humanism begin with, “In the beginning Matter.” Matter is all there is, and it not only thinks, but is Divine:

“…matter itself continually attains to higher perfection under its own power, thanks to indwelling dialectic…the dialectical materialists attribution of ‘dialectic’ to matter confers on it, not mental attributes only, but even divine ones.” (Dialectical Materialism, Gustav A. Wetter, 1977, p. 58)

In explicitly religious language, the following religionists offer all praise, honor, and glory to their Creator:

“We may regard the material and cosmic world as the supreme being, as the cause of all causes, as the creator of heaven and earth.” (Vladimir Lenin quoted in Communism versus Creation, Francis Nigel Lee, 1969, p. 28)

“The Cosmos is all that is or ever will be.” (Carl Sagan, Cosmos, 1980, p. 4)

Evolutionary Humanism has demonstrated itself to be an extremely dangerous worldview. In just the first eighty-seven years of the twentieth century, the evolutionist project of radically transforming the world and mankind through the power of evolutionism has led to the extermination of between 100-170 million ‘subhuman’ men, women, and children.

Deadly Problems

First, in order that materialist ethics be consistent with the idea that life evolved by chance and continues to evolve over time, ethics must be built on human social instincts that are in a continuous process of change over evolutionary time. This view demolishes both moral ethics and social taboos, thereby liberating man to do as he pleases. Over time this results in a lawless climate haunted by bullies, predators, despots, psychopaths, and other unsavory elements.

Perhaps Darwin could not envision the evil unleashed by his ideas. Nonetheless, he did have some inkling, for he wrote in his “Autobiography” that one who rejects God,

“…can have for his rule of life…those impulses and instincts which are strongest or…seem to him the best ones.” (Fatal Fruit, Tom DeRosa, p.7)

Humanist Max Hocutt realizes that materialist ethics are hugely problematical, but offers no solution. An absolute moral code cannot exist without God, however God does not exist, says Hocutt. Therefore,

“…if there were a morality written up in the sky somewhere but no God to enforce it, I see no reason why we should obey it. Human beings may, and do, make up their own rules.” (Understanding the Times, David Noebel, p. 138-139)

Jeffrey Dahmer, a psychopath who cannibalized his victims, acted on Darwin’s advice. In an interview he said,

“If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then…what is the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought…I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime.” (Dahmer in an interview with Stone Phillips, Dateline NBC, 11/29/1994)

With clearly religious overtones, atheist philosopher Bertrand Russell summarizes the amoral materialist ethic:

“Blind to good and evil, reckless of destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way.” (Russell, “Why I am not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects,” 1957, p. 115)

Next, materialist epistemology and metaphysics dispossesses man of soul, free will, conscience, mind, and reason, thereby dehumanizing (animalizing) man and totally destroying not only the worth, dignity, and meaning of human life, but the possibility of freedom. The essence of this annihilation is captured in the following quotes:

Man is “but fish made over…” declared biologist William Etkin (Pushing the Antithesis, Greg L. Bahnsen, p. 224). And his life is but a “partial, continuous, progressive, multiform and continually interactive, self-realization of the potentialities of atomic electron states,” explained J.D. Bernal (1901-1971), past Professor of Physics at the University of London (The Origin of Life, Bernal, 1967, xv). Furthermore, “The universe cares nothing for us,” trumpets William Provine, Cornell University Professor of Biology, “and we have no ultimate meaning in life.” (Scientists, Face It! Science and Religion are Incompatible,” The Scientist, Sept. 1988)

Man... “must be degraded from a spiritual being to an animalistic pattern. He must think of himself as an animal, capable of only animalistic reactions. He must no longer think of himself…as capable of ‘spiritual endurance,’ or nobility.” By animalizing man his “state of mind…can be ordered and enslaved.” (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, “Degradation and Shock,” Chapter viii)

Finally, Evolutionary Humanism posits the notion that despite the fact that man is “but fish made over…” there are in fact, some exceptions to this rule. For it happens---by chance of course---that some lucky ‘species’ and ‘races’ of the human animal are more highly evolved (superior) and therefore enlightened than the others, who are---unluckily for them---less evolved and as a consequence, subhuman. Paired to this view is the idea that if a species or race does not continue to evolve (progress up the evolutionary ladder), it will become extinct. Together, these ideas lead logically to the deadly conclusion that in order to preserve the fittest of the species---or the spiritually evolved, as is the case with Spiritual Communism--- it is morally incumbent upon the superior to replace (via the science of eugenics and population control) and/or liquidate the subhumans. In his book, “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” (1871) Charles Darwin foresaw this eventuality:

“At some future period…the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world…the anthropomorphous apes…will no doubt be exterminated.” (Descent, 2^nd ed., p. 183)

In practice, the materialist worldview is a hellish recipe for catastrophe, as was amply demonstrated by the 20^th century’s two most blood-soaked political movements--- pagan Nazism and atheist Communism. Both rejected God, and both were animated by Darwinism

Nazi Germany

Hitler’s murderous philosophy was built on Darwinian evolution and preservation of favored species. In his book, “Evolution and Ethics, British evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith notes,

“The leader of Germany is an evolutionist not only in theory, but, as millions know to their cost, in the rigor of its practice.” (1947, p.230)

It was Darwinism that inspired Hitler to try to create---by way of eugenics--- a superior race, the Aryan Man. In pursuit of his ambition, Hitler eliminated what he considered were inferior human animals, among which were for example, Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and Christians.

Evolutionism in Nazi Germany resulted in gas chambers, ovens, and the liquidation of eleven million “useless eaters” and other undesirables. Evolutionist Niles Eldridge, author of “Darwin: Discovering the Tree of Life,” reluctantly concurs. Darwin’s theory, he acknowledges,

“has given us the eugenics movement and some of its darker outgrowths, such as the genocidal practices of the Nazis.” (2005, p. 13)

The Soviet Union

Even though Karl Marx wrote his Communist Manifesto before Darwin published his “On the Species,” the roots of Communism are nonetheless found in Darwinism. Karl Marx wrote Fredrich Engels that Darwin’s ‘Origin’,

“is the book which contains the basis in natural science for our view.” (Marxian Biology and the Social Scene, Conway Zirkle, 1959)

Stephane Courtois, one of the authors of The Black Book of Communism, relates that,

“In Communism there exists a sociopolitical eugenics, a form of Social Darwinism.” (p. 752)

Vladimir Lenin exulted that,

“Darwin put an end to the belief that the animal and vegetable species bear no relation to one another (and) that they were created by God, and hence immutable.” (Fatal Fruit, Tom DeRosa, p. 9)

Lenin exercised godlike power over life and death. He saw himself as, “the master of the knowledge of the evolution of social species.” It was Lenin who “decided who should disappear by virtue of having been condemned to the dustbin of history.” From the moment Lenin made the “scientific” decision that the bourgeoisie represented a stage of humanity that evolution had surpassed, “its liquidation as a class and the liquidation of the individuals who actually or supposedly belonged to it could be justified.” (The Black Book of Communism, p. 752)

Alain Brossat draws the following conclusions about the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, and the ties that bind them:

“The ‘liquidation’ of the Muscovite executioners, a close relative of the ‘treatment’ carried out by Nazi assassins, is a linguistic microcosm of an irreparable mental and cultural catastrophe that was in full view on the Soviet Stage. The value of human life collapsed, and thinking in categories replaced ethical thought…In the discourse and practice of the Nazi exterminators, the animalization of Other…was closely linked to the ideology of race. It was conceived in the implacably hierarchical racial terms of “subhumans” and “supermen”…but in Moscow in 1937, what mattered…was the total animalization of the Other, so that a policy under which absolutely anything was possible could come into practice.” (ibid, p. 751)

21^st Century America

Ronald Reagan loved God and America. America he said is, “the moral force that defeated communism and all those who would put the human soul into bondage.” (Republican National Convention, Houston TX, 8/17/1992)

Even though he was optimistic about America’s future he nevertheless cautioned that America must maintain her reliance on God and her commitment to righteousness and morality. He liked quoting Alexis de Tocqueville’s insightful analysis of the source of America’s greatness:

“Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret and genius of her power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.” (In the Words of Ronald Reagan, by Michael Reagan)

As America moves into the 21^st century, we have yet to admit a shameful, dark secret. Evolutionism…the creation myth, that empowered Nazism and Communism, is being taught to America’s youth in our government-controlled schools. The animalization of Americans is well advanced and coupled to a corresponding slow collapse of human worth. Already we hear of human life spoken of in dehumanizing categories such as ‘vegetable,’ “non-persons,” and ‘uterine content.’

Ominously, Evolutionary Humanism has also outstripped Judeo-Christian precepts in our universities, judiciary, federal bureaucracy, corporations, medicine, law, psychology, sociology, entertainment, news media and halls of Congress. As Biocentrism it fuels the nonhuman animal rights project, the gay rights movement, radical feminism, and the increasingly powerful and influential green environmentalist program, which demands that America submit to the draconian mandates of the Kyoto Treaty.

America, the “moral force that defeated communism” is on the verge of completely rejecting God, the natural order, and moral absolutes and instead, embracing the godless religion of evolution, amorality, and the unnatural.

Evolutionary Humanism is the most dangerous delusion thus far in history. It begins with the ‘animalization of Other,’ in tandem with the elevation of the ‘superior,’ for whom this serves as a license to make up their own rules, abuse power, and force their will onto the citizens. This is accompanied by a downward spiraling process that pathologizes the natural order, moral ethics, virtue, and social taboos while simultaneously elevating narcissism, tyranny, cruelty, nihilism, confusion, perversion, sadism, theft, and lying to positions of politically correct “new morality,” which is then enforced through sensitivity training, speech codes, hate crime laws, and other intimidation tactics. If not stopped, as history warns us, this rapidly escalating downward process leads inevitably to totalitarianism, enslavement, and eventually mass murder.

In a portent of things to come, evolutionist B.F. Skinner said:

“A scientific analysis of behavior dispossesses autonomous man and turns the control he has been said to exert over to the environment. The individual…is henceforth to be controlled…in large part by other men.” (Understanding the Times, David Noebel, p. 232)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

www.patriotsandliberty.com/

Linda is the author of many published essays on culture, worldview, and politics. Her essays are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of MoveOff.org

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800-page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism; p. 751)

Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”

(Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.”

(Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America. Communism (multiculturalism/Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system…has outstripped Judeo-Christian precepts in the universities…judiciary…federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology…arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times; David A. Noebel; p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are ‘animalized’ through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.”

….Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers---having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment--- incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.”

…Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw power-grabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably-developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This ‘shadow government’ of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George HW Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife…Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana. Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond…Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)…will be primarily by light rail systems…highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans-Texas Corridor” now being designed…” (Eco-logic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

Property Acquisition Schemes

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.” …John Adams

(The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States; Charles Francis Adams, editor, Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquire by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key ‘land-taking’ strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”…” (ibid)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week last year (2006), three young Florida women were attacked by so-called ‘managed’ alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. ‘Managed’ wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self-defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners hand-cuffed by politically correct Dept.of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves…the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the families horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves…(More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch…” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/?p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male---who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ---has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created…” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and…fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet…until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”…David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service

“…Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.” (ibid)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

Linda is the author of numerous published articles on culture, worldview, and politics. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of MoveOff.org.

Resources:

The Green Counter-Establishment: How It Holds Power; Bonner R. Cohen; Capital Research Center

Sustainable Development: Transforming America; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

The Importance of Morality and Religion in Government; WallBuilders.com

Al Gore, the United Nations, and the Cult of Gaia; Cliff Kinkaid; USAsurvival.org

Green Religion and Public Policy; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

In “The Historical Roots of ‘Political Correctness,’ author Raymond V. Raehn observed that America is “dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes, and values that we have come to know as ‘Political Correctness.’  Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all Americans and is therefore totalitarian in nature.  Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.” (www.freecongress.org)

Political Correctness and Multiculturalism are a modified version of Marxism formulated by the Frankfurt School.  The new version is simply Marxism translated from economic terms into cultural terms.  The proletariat is no longer the working class but cultural fringe elements such as man-hating females, members of the criminal element, and the ‘sexually confused,’ known in Marxist-speak as the ‘gay subspecies.’  The correct label for this modified version is Cultural Marxism.

Behind radical feminism, same-sex marriage, the androgyny theme, gay pride, and the overall pattern of degeneration at all levels of society throughout America and the West lies a revamped international Communist revolution.  Being anti-Stalinist it shuns the Communist label and instead disguises itself as Multiculturalism and Political Correctness.  Separation of church and state, pornography, easy divorce, open borders, extreme sex education, abortion, gay pride, same-sex marriage, androgyny, political correctness, speech codes, the wreckage of the traditional family, and hate crime laws---all were imported to the Christian West from the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union.  We did not recognize it as Communism because we believed Stalin’s modified version to be the original communism.

Pre-Stalinist Soviet Union

In analyzing Marxism, historian Arnold Toynbee revealed that it is a distinctly ’religious’ secular humanist inspiration whose God is the Goddess of Historical Necessity.  Marxism, states Toynbee, “is the apocalyptic vision of a violent revolution which is inevitable because it is the decree…of (the Goddess), and which is to invert the present roles of Proletariat and Dominant Majority…in a reversal of roles which is to carry the Chosen People…from the lowest to the highest place in the Kingdom of this World.” (A Study of History)

In other words, the patriarchal Christian culture was to be turned upside-down and the chosen ones---the proletariat and their subculture---placed into positions of dominance.  The new Kingdom was to be matrist and polymorphously perverse. 

In the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union, Bolshevik religious fanatics---believing they were “scientific high-priests” endowed with “God-like” creative powers---literally attempted to scientifically re-engineer not only a New Man but a polymorphously perverse Kingdom of this World where androgynous beings could move fluidly into and out of sexually-gratifying relationships.  Before they could begin this monstrously inhuman project, Marxists first had to deconstruct both man and his existing culture.

Nihilism in the Name of “Science---Amen!”

The first order of business was to ‘exorcise’ Elohim, Creator of the universe and the source of patriarchy.  This they attempted to do by declaring a ‘separation of church and state.’ “The Bolsheviks took power in 1917 and declared a separation of church and state.  Thus the Russian Orthodox Church found itself without official state backing for the first time in its history.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Orthodox_Church)

Abolishing the ‘oppressive’ patriarchal family came next.  Toward this end, universal moral law was tossed aside, wives and mothers were forced into factories, abortions made free, and divorces attained within minutes.  Catastrophe ensued:  “When the Bolsheviki came into power in 1917, they regarded the family…with fierce hatred and set out…to destroy it.  One must live in Russia today, amid the atmosphere of torment, disgust, and disillusionment that pervades sex relations, the chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that hover over the Russian family…Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another…Abortions cover our villages with shame.  Formerly we did not even hear of them.”  (The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage, by a Woman Resident in Russia; Atlantic Monthly, Vol.138, No.1, pp 108-114, July 1926).

Bolsheviks ‘liberated’ thousands upon thousands of hapless children from their ‘oppressive’ families. Taking control of schools, they filled the heads of children with worthless propaganda, atheism, and extreme sex education.  Additionally, children were psychologically manipulated into not only turning against their own families, but into spying upon them as well.  The consequences were enormous:  devastated families, destroyed lives: child rapists, murderers, thieves, bullies, and outright sociopaths.

‘Equality’ (sameness) was created between “natural intercourse” and the paraphilias, including sodomy.  “Concerning…sodomy, and various other forms of sexual gratification, which are set down in European legislation as offenses against public morality---Soviet legislation treats these the same as so-called ‘natural intercourse.”  (Soviet Union in the 1920s: Scientific, Not Utopian” www.workers.org)

Like falling dominoes, the collapsing family led to the fall of social order, culture, and then the economy, unleashing a tidal wave of crime, corruption, sexual debauchery, and chaos.  When Stalin came to power, he took immediate steps to restore order.  The family and ethics were restored, abortion and divorce made difficult to obtain, and sodomy, gender-bendering, etc. were re-criminalized.  In taking these steps, Stalin destroyed the Bolshevik’s ‘revolution,’ for which they hate him to this day. 

Return of the Bolsheviks

A revitalized Bolshevik Left reorganized itself in the 1960s.  To distinguish itself from the Stalinist version of Communism, it dubbed itself the New Left. 

By the late 1960’s, the New Left’s Gramscian-style cultural revolution had begun in earnest in both America and the West.  Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide.  Partnered to their campaign of nihilism has been a relentlessly brutal assault on Christians, Orthodox Jews, conservatives, the military, and straight males (particularly white males) in which all are marginalized,  psychologically bullied and targeted as ‘homophobes, bigots, racists, fascists, intolerant, divisive, and mentally ill,” or in other words, “Enemies of the People.”

With the support of big money transnational progressive foundations and individuals like George Soros, and in cooperation with Leftist media, the UN and radical non-governmental organizations, the New Left has successfully taken their aggressive ‘social engineering’ revolution worldwide and is forcing the traditional family to the brink of destruction.  Now they seek to push it over the edge with the ‘same-sex marriage’ scheme.  Additionally, children are slowly but surely coming under control of the ‘global village’ and being atheitized and sexualized while parents are increasingly marginalized and terrorized. From behind the barricades of the phony ‘separation of church and state’ clause, Cultural Marxists are erasing the Christian heritage of America and the West while simultaneously engaging in a brutal psychological assault against Christians and Orthodox Jews. Harnessed to these crusades is one designed to create ‘sameness’ between natural intercourse and all varieties of sexual gratification.  This scheme goes by the name, ‘gay rights.’  And because all of the preceding is naturally abhorrent to people, draconian hate crime laws and speech codes are being legislated to enforce conformity and compliance. 

The New Left’s global revolution comes to light in the following examples:

1.      England: Don’t Abuse Gay Rights: In May last year, an Oxford student jokingly asked a police officer: Do you realize your horse is gay?  Two squad cars arrived, the student was arrested and kept overnight in a police cell.”  (www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk, 12/18/06)  Note: see UK’s Sexual Orientation Regulations here: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20031661.htm )

2.      UN NGO: IGLHRC (International Gay, Lesbian Human Rights Commission) Calls the US Marriage Amendment an International Human Rights Violation (www.iglhrc.org/ 6/5/06)

3.      USA (Extreme Sex Educators): “Time Magazine, School Event Expose Massive Cultural Campaign to Promote Homosexuality to Children”…”We’re gonna win,” says (GLSEN founder Kevin) Jennings, “because of what’s happening in high schools right now.” (www.cwfa.org/ 10/7/05)

4.      Northern Ireland:  Lawyers Christian Fellowship to Rally against Sexual Orientation Regulations, “The government (widely criticized for) using…direct rule powers to fast-track (sexual orientation regulations).  (www.ChristianToday.com/ 12/23/06)

5.      London: Homophobia Spies in the Classroom, “Schools that fail to show enthusiasm in rooting out prejudice against homosexuals should be reported to police.”  (www.thisislondon.co.uk/ 12/28/06)

6.      England: January’s ‘The Pink News’ celebrates a good month for combating homophobia incitement with the conviction of Tory councilor Peter Willow and the Advertising Standard Authority’s investigation into an anti-gay Christian ad…The…litmus test for free speech is seeing if the vocabulary would work universally.”   (www.pinknews.co.uk/ 12/27/06)

7.      Germany: “Germany Uses Nazi Era Law to Imprison Mom for Homeschooling; Family Flees to Austria” (www.lifesite.net/ 9/14/06)

8.      USA: “Hate-Crime Legislation Reappears” (www.citizenlink.org/ 1/16/07)

9.      USA: “Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization”…In May, 2003, the American Psychiatric Assoc. met…to debate removing such paraphilias as pedophilia, transvestism, fetishism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism from the DSM (www.traditionalvalues.org)

10.  USA: ‘California Psychiatrist Wants ‘Extreme Bias’ against Homosexuality Added to DSM” (NARTH, 1/6/06)

Both Orthodox-Christian Russia and Poland suffered catastrophically, first at the hands of Bolshevik fanatics and then later, under Stalin.  Yet none of that matters to Cultural Marxist New Left sociopaths, for they have returned for ‘round two.’

1.      Poland: “Official Homophobia Threatens Basic Freedoms, “Poland’s leaders have stoked the fires of homophobic hatred to advance their political careers,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. (Human Rights Watch, 5/5/06)

2.      Russia:  “Mayor Luzhkov of Moscow Violates European Convention on Human Rights by Banning First Gay Pride Parade on May 27” (www.iglhrc.org/ 5/23/06)

Through utilization of a protracted stealth campaign to impose Cultural Marxism on America and the West, the New Left has succeeded in inverting our social, cultural, political, and moral order.  As a result, we now exist in an Orwellian ‘upside-down’ world where, as evil subterranean forces work tirelessly to subvert and pervert our children, abolish marriage, abort our future citizens (babies), throw open our borders, undermine our laws and in short, to utterly destroy our civilizations, the source of evil brazenly accuses the defenders of ‘home and hearth’ of being “intolerant, bigoted, sexist, racist, fascist, homophobic, and insane.”  This is like a sociopath accusing the morally upright man of being a sociopath.

The French philosopher and former Marxist, Bernard-Henri Levi astutely observed, “Apply Marxism in any country you want, you will always find a Gulag in the end.”

In league with transnational progressives, New Left fanatics are stealthily lowering the “iron curtain” upon the New Soviet Union---America and the West.   Political activism by conservatives, Christians, and all traditional-values patriots is no longer just a civic and moral duty.  It’s now a matter of our very survival.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

About Linda:  Linda is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Related Articles:

America’s Second Civil War

Bolshevik’s ‘Gay Pride’ Disaster and its Lesson for America

The New Left, Cultural Marxism, and Psychopolitics Disguised as Multiculturalism

Trotsky’s Permanent Revolution in America

Marxist Subversion and Perversion of America’s Youth

.   

“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international…network which operates…in the way the radical right believes the Communists act…this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups…” (Prof. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton, in his opus, Tragedy and Hope; Source: A Chronological History: The New World Order, D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D)  

In a powerful composition entitled, “The Ideological War within the West,” author John Fonte cautions that, “Talk in the West of a ‘culture war’ is somewhat misleading because the arguments over transnational vs. national citizenship, multiculturalism vs. assimilation, and global governance vs. national sovereignty are not simply cultural, but ideological and philosophical.  They pose Aristotle’s question, “What kind of government is best?” (AsiaTimes Online, May 30, 2002)

Fonte identifies two separate, but not terribly distinct, ‘ideological and philosophical’ movements, each of which are working towards the ultimate goal of a ‘post-constitutional,’ ‘post-liberal,’ ‘post-democratic’ ‘post-American,’ and post-Christian authoritarian regime.  Fonte refers to these two movements as ‘transnational progressives’ and the ‘transnational right.’ 

Transnational Right

“I see a world of open borders, open trade…open minds; a world that celebrates…the common heritage that belongs to all the world’s people…I see a world where democracy continues to win new friends and convert old foes…where the Americas---North, Central, and South---can provide a model for the future of all humankind: the world’s first completely democratic hemisphere…a world building on the emerging new model of European unity…”(President George Bush I, in an address before the 45^th session of the UN General Assembly in New York)

In identifying the transnational right, Fonte used as his example, Libertarians whose, “demand for ‘open borders’…has strengthened the left’s anti-assimilationist agenda.” Tom Tancredo, Phyllis Schlafly, Howard Phillips, Jim Gilchrist, and other conservatives point to President Bush, in company with other globalists, as being transnationalists as well.  President Bush said Tancredo, “is going to do what he can to create a place where the idea of America is just that, it’s an idea.  It’s not an actual place defined by borders.”  The transnational right are part of an unofficial ‘open borders’ lobby, “a coalition of lawmakers, corporations, and advocacy groups who see our national borders as an impediment to progress, an anachronism in these ‘enlightened’ times of global communications, commerce, and travel.” (In Mortal Danger, Tom Tancredo, p. 195)

The objective of the transnational right is the piece-meal deconstruction of our sovereign Republic in expectation of dissolving our nation into a supranational macro-organization comprised of Canada, the United States, and Mexico.  This suprastate--- or as George Bush, Sr. called it, “the world’s first completely democratic hemisphere”--- is to be called the North American Union, and will be built on the model of the European Union.

Phyllis Schlafly’s ‘Eagle Forum’ provides us with a compilation of North America Union documents, NAFTA maps and much more at:  http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/NAU/   Additionally, Jim Gilchrist’s Minuteman Project has launched the “Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership” website at http://stopspp.com/stopspp/  There you’ll also find a collection of SPP and FOIA documentation,  SPP ‘transnational corridor’ maps, and top-notch investigative journalism.

“The documents,” said Dr. Jerome Corsi, “give clear evidence that the Bush administration has created a ‘shadow government’…This is totally outside the U.S. Constitution, virtually an executive branch coup d’etat.”  (Documents Reveal Shadow Government; WorldNetDaily.com, Oct. 24, 2006)

In speaking of the NAU and transnational corridor schemes, Congressman Ron Paul remarked, “The real issue is national sovereignty…decisions that affect millions of Americans are not being made by those Americans…or even by their elected representatives in Congress.  Instead, a handful of elites use their government connections to bypass national legislatures and ignore our Constitution (this superhighway) will require coordinated federal and state eminent domain actions on an unprecedented scale, as literally millions of people and businesses could be displaced.  The loss of whole communities is almost certain…the ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union, complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel.” (The NAU: It’s the Eleventh Hour—Get Busy, Devvy Kidd, NewsWithViews.com)

In President Bush’s first news conference after the Republican trouncing, Bush said he not only shares the Democratic ‘vision’ on immigration, but looks forward to working with them in order to pass his pro-amnesty bill.  “With alignment now in Congress and the White House, this is a unique opportunity,” said Representative Howard L. Berman (D-CA), a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee and a leader of the immigration reform issue. (Say No to Guest Worker Amnesty, Chris Simcox, MinutemanHQ.com, Dec. 1, 2006)

Transnational Progressives

“…a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States…the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education…people are told what to think about…the old order is…crumbling…Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease…A new vision is required…a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions…a new Constitution is necessary.”  (The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change; sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation; thoughts from author Arthur S. Miller; Source: A Chronological History: The New World Order, by D.L. Cuddy, Ph.D)

On November 8^th, in what has been termed a ‘referendum on Bush and the Iraqi war,” millions of grossly misinformed Americans---large numbers of them made paranoid through mainstream media-induced fears of ‘fundy boogiemen’ and ‘evil theocrats,’ swept corrupt Republicans out of power.  “Change,” was the thing they had been told to believe was what they needed most, so they voted for ‘change’ by pulling Democratic levers.  As a consequence, Americans unwittingly empowered another bunch of transnationals, for Nancy Pelosi and her Progressive ‘Marxist’ Caucus---who will take command of most Congressional chairmanship seats-- are but the sock-puppets for the transnational Shadow Party (SP).  The primary architect of the SP is billionaire George “I am God” Soros.  He shares power with his two main co-conspirators---Marxist-trained Hillary R. Clinton and mob-lawyer Harold Ickes.

The SP is a transnational network of globalist millionaires and billionaires, mob-run unions and government unions, progressive think-tanks, ‘make love, not war’ peace activists, wacko-environmentalists, gun control advocates, human rights activists, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as Amnesty International-USA, Human Rights Watch, National Council of Churches, NAACP, and the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educators Fund (MALDEF).  Playing key roles as agitators, rumor-mongers, organizers, and intimidators is the Marxist New Left, exemplified by the ACLU---key member of the Left’s Open Borders Lobby--- Code Pink, Global Exchange, After Downing Street, Center for Constitutional Justice, and others.

It was through the McCain-Feingold Act---a Trojan Horse engineered and bankrolled by Soros and other big money globalists--- that the SP gained control of the Democratic Party.  McCain-Feingold works by outlawing large soft-money campaign financing traditionally relied upon by the Democrats, a ploy that forced the Democratic Party into near bankruptcy.  At this juncture, in rushed the SP with a ‘convenient’ plan to save the day.  SP operatives and organizations would ‘kindly’ raise money for the Democratic Party.  However, there was one catch: George ‘Lenin’ Soros and Hillary ‘Stalin’ Clinton would control the purse-strings.  As a result, Soros and Hillary now shape and control  Party platform, field candidates---and purge candidates like Joe Liebermann---run campaigns, and so on.  So successful has the scam been that one SP operative, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser triumphantly exclaimed, “Now it’s our party.  We bought it, we own it.”

Using Progressive Caucus ‘sock puppets,’ Soros and Hillary will try to force their own globalist agenda upon America.  Their objective---which in many ways mirrors that of the transnational Right--- calls for the radical deconstruction of America, massive redistribution of America’s wealth and natural resources, confiscation of property, confiscation of children (who will be raised by the Global Village), destruction of the traditional family and culture, and the outlawing of Christianity.  Richard Poe observed, “Soros seems to favor some sort of religious apartheid, with fundamentalist Christians banished to a socio-political Bantustan.” (The Shadow Party; Jamie Glazov, FrontPage Magazine, 8/29/2006)

In his book, The Age of Fallibility, George Soros declared, “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.”  Destroying the United States has become an obsession of Soros.  In pursuit of his goal, he has, “assembled an army of radical allies who have long been at war with the American system…Soros has constructed a party…unlike any in American history.  It is not an American-style party…accountable to the people and subject to their will, but is more like a Leninist vanguard party, fully as conspiratorial and just as unaccountable…The SP has a dimension of which Leninists could never dream.  It is a party of rebels but also a party of rulers---a corporate unity of capital and labor.  And it has insinuated itself into the heart of the American system.”  (The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party, by David Horowitz and Richard Poe, p. 243)

Through employment of a Gramscian-style ‘quiet revolution,’ the Marxist New Left have, for over forty years, been quietly transforming America’s social, cultural, and political institutions.  Now, with the backing of George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and other transnational progressives, they are ready to make their move.  From their positions of power and influence within the Democratic hierarchy, they will undermine the war against Islamofascism, affect an ignoble retreat from Iraq and Afghanistan, and encourage America to drown and disappear under a massive flood of unassimilated immigrants.

Throughout the history of the world, citizens lived in fearful submission to their government.  Whoever controlled the sources of power (wealth, resources, government) told the citizens what freedoms and privileges---if any---they could have.  America’s Constitutional Republic was and is yet, something entirely unique.   In America, ‘we the people,’ empowered by man’s Creator, tell the government what it is allowed to do.  For the first time in the history of the world, a system of government was built “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

Transnationalism, whether from the Left or the so-called Right, is completely antithetical to our system of government.  Transnationalism is fundamentally authoritarian.  It’s the iron-fisted rule of the ‘enlightened’ few over the “stupid, unwashed masses.”  Transnationals are quietly usurping power and authority, devising implements of tyranny and subjugation, and forging the chains of slavery.

Conservatives, we are in an epic battle for the survival not just of our Republic, but for our rights and freedoms under our Creator’s Law.  All must join this battle.  None should sit on the sidelines.  Only by working together can we defeat the enemies of individual liberty and save America for our children, grandchildren, and future generations.

Let’s Roll, conservatives!

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006      

PatriotsandLiberty

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

About the writer:  Linda is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

A recent edition of the Hopewell News, a Virginia newspaper reported, “A Richmond attorney…has advised the Prince George County School Board not to block a proposed Gay-Straight Alliance club from forming at Prince George High School.”  “Should the issue be taken to court”, said attorney D. Pat Lacy, Sr. of Richmond, “the school system would lose.”  (Gay-Straight Club Active at PGHS, Hopewell News, Oct. 6, 2006)

Common sense, traditional values Americans are outraged that schools are allowing Gay-Straight Alliances (GSA) into schools.  They want to know who is behind these clubs and   their true motivations.

The plain truth is that both the GSA and Gay, Lesbian, Straight Educators Network (GLSEN), the organization that registers GSAs, are part of a vast, interconnected network of Cultural Marxist front groups known collectively as the New Left.  For over forty years, the New Left---a collection of Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyites, Maoists, and anarchists have been waging a Gramscian style “quiet revolution” for the overthrow of Christianity and America’s Constitution, Rule of Law, sovereignty, and way of life.

While propagandists in the media have deftly kept the attention of most folks riveted on what they’ve been told to believe are the ‘real threats’ to America, such as gas prices, genuine Christianity, and mad cow disease, Marxist-trained psychopoliticians, propagandists, and change agents have descended upon the schools and are subjecting children and older youth to thought control and social re-engineering methodologies. 

A position paper unwittingly published by the ACLU of Texas reveals why, “This generation of children will be the next generation of adult citizens who will make decisions on the directions this country will take.  They will be molded by whatever education they receive.”  (The ACLU vs. America, Alan Sears and Craig Osten, p 71)

Couple that candid admission to the following, by Deanna Duby of the National Educators Association (NEA), a staunch ally of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and GLSEN, “The fear of the Religious Right is that the schools of today are the governments of tomorrow.  And you know what, they’re right.”  (ibid, p. 71)

Note: ACLU, NEA, GLSEN, GSA on Communist Party USA website: http://www.cpusa.org/link/group/0/

In the overthrowing of America, Cultural Marxists are utilizing a criminal methodology which originated in the USSR and whose ultimate goal can be characterized by its operative doctrine—nihilism.  “Nihilism: originally in Russia, a social doctrine that defied all authority; revolutionism bent on the overthrow of all existing institutions.” (Funk and Wagnall’s Dictionary, 1948)

Two key strategies included within the doctrine of nihilism were added after WWI by two Marxist theoreticians, Antonio Gramsci and Georg Lukacs.  These strategies had to do with how to destroy the Christian West, which both men concluded was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 1600 years, it was therefore completely fused with Western civilization.  The West, advised Gramsci, would have to be dechristianized and simultaneously atheitized by means of a “long march through the culture” so as to slowly infiltrate and then radically transform every cultural institution from the family, to the church, seminaries, schools, universities, judiciary, media, entertainment, politics, and political parties

Extreme (obscene) sex education was the strategy added by Lukacs.  He reasoned that if Christian sexual ethics such as chastity (abstinence), fidelity, and monogamy could be undermined among children, then both the hated traditional family and Christianity would be dealt crippling blows.  Towards this end, Lukacs launched radical sex education programs in the schools.  Children, under the control of Bolshevik commissars, were force-fed atheism and instructed in all aspects of promiscuity while simultaneously encouraged to deride and reject their parents, pastors, and Christian moral ethics.  All of this was accompanied by a reign of terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and other dissenters.  Lukacs’ strategic method would later be brought to American schools by among others, the NEA, ACLU, GLSEN, and GSA.

In the following excerpts from, “Soviet Occupation of Poland, 1939” the application of Marxist criminal methodology can be plainly seen:

“Seeing their incapacity of making headway…to win over the population…Bolsheviks…direct all…efforts towards inculcating their principles in the young.  As they have absolute power and no scruples, their methods can easily be imagined.  Religion, Polish History and Literature, Latin and Greek were immediately removed from the curriculum (and the) schools submerged in worthless propaganda (which) is intended to destroy their hearer’s faith in everything they had hitherto been taught to love and respect.”

“Atheism is of great importance in the Bolshevik system of education.  Even children in…nurseries are subjected to (it).  A sort of maniacal stress is laid on the dissolution of morals.  Soviet officers (teach about) sexual life in classrooms attended by little girls (and) explain that chastity was a prejudice of decayed bourgeoisie.  The helpless indignation of parents forced to put up with…shameless inroads on everything they hold sacred can be imagined.  Their helplessness and misery are callously discounted by those in power…every effort is made to undermine all feelings of respect and trust towards their parents.” (http://felsztyn.tripod.com/id15.html)

Nationwide, GLSEN has established GSAs in more than 3,000 Leftist controlled ‘indoctrination camps’ aka public schools.  In bastions of Marxist control such as California and Massachusetts, GLSEN is brazenly ‘sensitizing’ youths into trying ‘diverse alternative’ lifestyle choices that decent people everywhere recoil in horror from.  Both the infamous sadomasochistic “Fistgate” and “Little Black Book---Q***r in the 21^st Century” were sponsored in part by GLSEN.  (Fistgate Special Report, http://www.massnews.com; The Little Black Book, Http://www.article8.org)

Towards the goal of perverting and subverting children, a California GSA had its middle and high school members march in the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade in June 2003.  They mingled freely with nude males, topless females, and sadomasochists.  Simulated sex acts were performed along the parade route.  At least one sign read, “Sodomize me, it’s legal!”  GLSEN used a yellow school bus to ferry youths to the parade. (Selling Homosexuality to America, www.coralridge.org, 2006)

Wherever GLSEN is resisted it fights back, often in partnership with the ACLU.  Through threat of lawsuits and other intimidation tactics, the ACLU and GLSEN batter decent Americans into submission.  For example, in Boyd County, KY, the ACLU and GLSEN used a court order to force children into attending psychopolitical “tolerance training.”   When hundreds of parents tried to “opt out” their children, the ACLU threatened further legal action to force parents to surrender their children to GLSEN commissars. 

In a WorldNetDaily article titled, “Gay Groups: We Have Rights to Your Children!” it states, “A collection of ‘gay’ organizations has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Massachusetts claiming they have every right to teach their doctrine to grade-school students.  Parental rights, according to the brief ‘have never meant that a parent can demand prior notice and the right to opt a child out…”   The article reveals that the groups involved are major Marxist-progressive ‘gay’ rights proponents: the Human Rights Campaign, the ACLU, Mass. Teachers Assoc., Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders. (WorldNetDaily, Oct. 6, 2006)

In an obvious effort at damaging the parent-child relationship, the ACLU---with help from GLSEN--- published a manual audaciously titled, “Making Schools Safe.”  This manual is a “blueprint for using schools to influence children to reject the values and beliefs of parents who oppose homosexuality.” (America vs. ACLU, p. 70)

In material to promote its “Day of Silence, “ a psychopolitical scheme designed to encourage defiance by youth towards parents, teachers, etc., GLSEN told children to “brainstorm” a list of people, “who are likely to stand in your way” or “expressed bias against LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) people.”  The list can include teachers, school board members, and relatives.  Children were advised that, “People who oppose your issue are…your opponents.” (America vs. the ACLU, p 71)

 Marxist-Progressives Who Fund the Subversion and Perversion of America’s Youth

On the bottom of the GSA homepage it states, “GSA is a project of the Tides Center.”

(http://www.gsanetwork.org/)

The Tides Center/Foundation funnels money from wealthy international and national donors---both individuals and foundations/institutes--- to the New Left’s matrix of communist front groups.  Essentially, the New Left is the “hired assassins” doing the dirty work for wealthy progressives who want America destroyed and don’t care about the criminal methods employed, but who don’t want to dirty their hands.  Among wealthy individuals who donate to Tides is Teresa Heinz Kerry, who has donated more than $4 million.   Another donor is multi-millionaire George Soros and his Shadow Party and Open Society Institute.

“The Tides ‘family’ of organizations is a nerve center of radical Shadow Party activity.  George Soros has given more than $17 million to the Tides Center since 1999.”  (The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party, David Horowitz and Richard Poe, p.126)

Other Marxist-progressive funders include, for example:

Pew Charitable Trusts, Bill Moyers, Ford Foundation, and John D. and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation

The Black Book of Communism recounts in horrific detail the crimes committed against humanity, culture, and civilization by adherents to the communist doctrine.  Stephane Courtois, one of the books authors, characterizes communism as a criminal ideology.  Former Pres. Reagan, a God-fearing man and one of America’s greatest leaders called the USSR an “empire of evil.”

How ironic that though the West won the Cold War, it is losing the ‘Culture War’ to the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy.  While we were not paying attention it stealthily crept into America and began injecting its ‘moral insanity’ producing venom into America’s cultural institutions.  Working under cover as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, sexual orientation, safe schools/safe sex, reproductive choice, porn as free speech, etc., the evil empire has entrenched itself right here in America.

As it works its destructive black magic upon the America of our Founders, it simultaneously takes control of America’s future---her children.  It is subverting and perverting them in much the same way as was done to the children of Christian Russia, Hungary, and Poland.

What Must We Do?

Americans must clear their minds of the psychopolitically-induced mind paste which prevents them from seeing the truth, which is that America was founded by God-fearing patriots who chose Christian principles on which to achieve independence.  In the words of John Adams, “The…principles on which the fathers achieved independence were…the general principles of Christianity.”  (Works, Vol. x, pp. 45-46, to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813)  When Gramsci and Lukacs pointed to Christianity as the obstacle preventing the establishment of a communist new world order, they were confessing to this truth.

If we wish to remain free, we must turn back to and rededicate ourselves to the source of our freedom and personal liberties: God the Creator and the principles of Christianity.  Parents must protect their children and keep them out of the grasping hands of the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy. And as a people united by the principles of freedom and personal liberty, we must commit ourselves to the long and arduous fight to recapture every square inch of our culture, laws, and government and cleanse them of the corruptions caused by the Church of Criminal Orthodoxy.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

PatriotsandLiberty

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

http://lindakimball.com/

Resources

The ACLU vs. America, Alan Sears & Craig Osten

The Black Book of Communism, Courtois, Werth, Panne, Paczkowski, Bartosek, Margolin

Radical Road Maps, James H. Hansen

From Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left, comes this relevant quote:  “For over forty years the New Left has been waging a Gramscian ‘quiet’ revolution for the overthrow of America’s Constitution, Rule of Law, sovereignty, and our way of life.  Today the subversives call themselves liberals, progressives, and Democrats (and) as David Horowitz attested to (the majority are) social justice seeking communists.  “The Democratic Party is very close to being the (Communist-controlled Progressive) party of Henry Wallace…the vast bulk of the American Left is a communist left.”  (How Marxism Dominates the Left, Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com, June 1, 2005)

The Backbone Campaign is a communist front group in the lefts vast interconnected matrix of revolutionary groups.  On its website it declares its goal is to: “empower citizens to nominate, comment on, and rate progressive leaders to serve as a virtual Progressive Parallel Administration…we are not content running campaigns, but preparing to run the country.”  (http://www.backbonecampaign.org/cabinet/ )

Chief among Backbone Campaign sponsoring organizations is the Progressive Democrats of America, who are committed to: “dismantling the military industrial complex.”  (ibid) 

“The Progressive Caucus is made up of the most Far-Left members of Congress and best represents the socialist wing of the Democratic Party.”  (Radical Road Maps, James H. Hansen, p. 186)  Progressive Democrats are responsible for installing Howard Dean as Democratic National Chairman.  In Feb. 2005, Dean was quoted by U.S. News and World Report as exclaiming: “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for.” Deans power base, according to DiscoverTheNetwork.org, are a bunch of “campus communists.” The Progressive Caucus will be the focus of this article.

Social Justice is Communism

Judging from the adolescent name-calling and howls of protest which my previous article elicited from Progressive groups such as the Democratic Underground, it is obvious that the enraged howlers have no idea of what it really means for one to be a seeker of social justice.  Either that or they really do know but are deceivers of the first magnitude.

Be that as it may, some clarification and definition of the terms—social justice and communism-- is in order before proceeding on to the issue of Progressive Democrats.

To most Americans, communism means the Kremlin, gulags, killing fields, and Mao’s brutal Red Guard.  These things though were not the essence of communism.  They were the visible manifestations of inhumane power and its consequences, all of which resulted when social justice seekers acquired total control to remake society and man.

The essence of communism is social justice, or justice in the social sphere.  This is code for the elimination of poverty, of suffering, and of all differences between humans that erect walls between people.  Fundamentally, social justice is a process of elimination  that results in sameness (egalitarianism).  When social justice seekers speak of the need for equality, what they’re really calling for is sameness.

However, the attributes which make people different from each other and which social justice seekers are determined to eliminate, are the product of human nature and of freely made choices.  For instance, some people are ambitious and hard-working while others are indolent and lazy and may willfully choose to live out of the pockets of the former.

It’s the positive aspects of human nature that make a society dynamic.  Dynamism is the animating force behind America’s greatness--her productivity, excellence, creativity, free markets, etc.  In eliminating human differences, social justice seekers kill all of this, and as they did in the former Soviet Union, leave behind a smoking ruin haunted by despairing cookie-cutter claymation beings.

In speaking of the social justice process of elimination, Balint Vazsonyi remarked, “Prophets of social justice—communists, whether by that name or any other name—focus on who should have less.  Because they have nothing to give, they can only take away.  First, they take away opportunity.  Next, they take away possessions.  In the end, they have to take away life itself.”  (America’s 30 Years War, Balint Vazsonyi, p. 59)

The America of our Founders simply cannot coexist with the Search for Social Justice.   For instance, as designed by our Founders, the Rule of Law exists to guarantee that unequal (different) people can have individual liberty, rights and possessions—including land ownership, which social justice seekers view as the original sin.  Social justice demands that those who possess more of anything have it taken away from those who earned it and redistributed to those who did nothing to earn it.

“Social Justice Seeking” Democratic Progressive Caucus

The Democratic Progressive Caucus (DPC) is an organization comprised of about sixty Members of Congress.  It was founded in 1991 by Rep. Bernie Sanders, former socialist mayor of Burlington, VT and member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).  The DSA describes itself as, “the principle U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International.”   (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The DPC advances its communist agenda behind innocuous sounding phrases such as social and economic justice.  The three core principles of The Progressive Promise are:

1. Fighting for economic justice and security for all. (Code for: We’re going to ‘eliminate poverty and suffering’ by taking away all of your possessions and redistributing them.)
2. Protecting and preserving our civil rights and civil liberties.  (Code for: We’re going to ‘eliminate’ all differences and pound everyone down to the lowest common denominator).

3. Promoting global peace and security.  (Code for: We—your Superiors—will finally feel secure and at peace once agendas 1-2 have been carried out to completion.)

(Source: http://www.bernie.house.gov/document_display_text.asp?FileToConvert=/pc/index.asp)

In “Pelosi Leader of Progressive Caucus,” it was revealed:  “Until 1999, the website of the Progressive Caucus was hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).  Following an expose of the link between the two organizations in World Net Daily, the Progressive Caucus established its own website.”  (WorldNetDaily.com, Nov 11, 2002)

On the website of the DSA it boldly declares: “We are socialists…Democracy and socialism go hand in hand…wherever…democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well.”  (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)  The DSA increases its influence and power by networking with the Democratic Party to advance social justice programs and policies such as affirmative action and Stalinist hate crime laws.  “Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party.” (ibid)

Following are brief descriptions of some of the social justice seeking subversives in the Democratic Progressive Caucus whose words and actions embrace the tenets of communism:

1. Barbara Lee (D-CA): “former agent of the Black Panther leader and convicted killer, Huey Newton.  Lee conspired with fellow communist, Cong. Ron Dellums, who used his authority to impede US foreign policy with regard to the Communist dictatorship of Grenada.” (www.DiscoverTheNetWork.org)  “anti-American Communist who supports America’s enemies and has actively collaborated with them.” (Radical Road Map, James H. Hansen, p.189)
2. Jim McDermott (D-WA): “In 2002, McDermott and fellow Progressive Caucus member Rep. David Bonoir (D-Mich) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) traveled to Baghdad, where they publicly embraced Saddam Hussein and created propaganda on his behalf.” (www.DiscoverTheNetWork.org)
3. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill), who has accepted an award from the DSA once told one of its writers: “The American people are not ideological; therefore, the way to go is to attack private power.” (ibid)
4. John Conyers (D-MI): “In 1981 Conyers co-hosted a delegation from the Soviet front World Peace Council, giving that group a forum in Congress.  Conyers endorsed a Communist-led antiwar demonstration in Washington in 1983 and…spoke at another Washington demonstration led by ANSWER in 2003.” (Radical Road Map’s, James H. Hansen, p 189)
5. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) “has taken part in…CAIR (a radical group with ties to Mideast terrorist organizations) events…including a Ramadan iftar…hosted (on Capitol Hill) by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), and Barbara Lee (D-CA).”  (Kucinich Headlines Muslim Fundraiser, WorldNetDaily.com, Nov. 30, 2003)

The Constitution requires that members of Congress “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this constitution.”  The Oath of Office sworn to by US Senators reads:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the U.S…that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.  So help me God.”

Very simply, if Democratic Progressive Caucus members truthfully believed in the Christian-Judeo God and likewise in our Constitution---the document conceived of by our Founders and not the Lefts living document nonsense—they wouldn’t be social justice seeking communists.  Rather, they would be Conservative Constitutionalists.  That they are social justice seekers tells us that when they took their oath before God, they lied.  Quite simply—they lied.

In Noah Webster’s 1828 edition of the American Dictionary of the English Language we find the correct term to apply to treacherous Democratic Progressives.  That word is “traitor,” and the following definition is the one most likely referred to by our Founders.  “Traitor:  One who violates allegiance and betrays his country; one guilty of treason…who, in breach of trust, delivers his country to its enemy…who aids an enemy in conquering his country.”

Through use of Stalinist psycho-politics, America’s Communist Left imprisoned the consciences of Americans within psychic strait-jackets of political correctness.  As long as we allow ourselves to be chained by political correctness, we will not be able to identify and speak openly about our enemies---those without, and those within.  In the absence of freedom of conscience and of clear and honest speaking, we can neither formulate strategies for our safety nor deal appropriately with the treacherous deceivers operating amongst us who are colluding with our enemies and plotting to destroy our nation from within.  The first order of business then, is for all Americans to break out of the psychic strait jackets of political correctness, thus allowing Truth to expose the treachery and treason at work in our nation.

Truth will set us free:  “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

PatriotsandLiberty

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

LindaKimball.com

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings have been published both nationally and internationally.

On one hand, Americans were outraged and appalled by the 1 May immigrant demonstrations that clogged streets and virtually closed down some cities.  Law abiding citizens saw lawbreakers who not only seemed to feel justified in their criminal behavior, but also believed they ought to be rewarded for it.

On the other hand, Americans are more infuriated and disgusted with their duly elected government officials in both legislative and administrative branches for not enforcing the law and protecting the rights of citizens.  President Bush and the weak-kneed GOP have deservedly come under fire.  However, if our sovereign nation is to survive, I is of paramount importance that the harsh light of truth be focused upon the subversive element responsible for creating an atmosphere conducive to lawlessness and tyrannical militants brazenly declaring their intentions to ‘conquer’ the Southwest and to throw Americans out of their homes and off of their land. 

The subversive element—a motley collection of Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyists, Maoists, anarchists and malcontents—organized themselves in the 60’s and became known as the New Left.  For over forty years the New Left has been waging a Gramscian ‘quiet’ revolution for the overthrow of the America of our Founders.  Today these subversives call themselves liberals, progressives and Democrats.  Even though there yet remain good, decent Democrats such as Zell Miller, the majority as David Horowitz attested to, are social justice seeking communists.  “The Democratic Party is very close to being the (Communist-controlled Progressive) party of Henry Wallace…The vast bulk of the American left is a Communist left and they’ve introduced some fascist ideas like “identity politics,” which is straight out of Mussolini.”  (How Marxism Dominates the Left, Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com, June 1, 2005)

Americas Communist Left operates in a vast interconnected matrix of revolutionary groups disguised as respectable civil rights and legal organizations.  These front groups have consistently worked towards the transformation of America through subversion of America’s Rule of Law, Constitution, judiciary, and all institutions necessary to the longevity and health of our nation and civilization.  These groups attack all national security measures, subvert immigration laws and procedures, lobby on behalf of terrorist and enemy combatants and engage in propagandistic apologetics for the most brutal dictatorships in the world even as they constantly vilify and demean America and Americans.  As they do these things to destroy America and shame Americans, they hypocritically portray themselves as defenders of democracy and humanity.

The purpose of this article is to expose, at least in part, some of the principal communist groups responsible for undermining and weakening America and who likewise serve as a power source, not only for the militant Marxist organizers of the recent demonstrations, but for Islamic jihadists as well.

The Quiet Revolution

In 1984, “The Power to Lead” was published.  In it, author James McGregor Burns admitted: “The Framers of the US Constitution have simply been too shrewd for us.  They have outwitted us.  They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering.  If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’…we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.” (A Chronological History: The New World Order by D.L. Cuddy PhD)

Turning the ‘Founders upside down’ and directly confronting the ‘constitutional structure’ are what the American Civil Liberties Union, National Lawyers Guild, and The Center for Constitutional Rights are committed to doing.  Together, these three communist front groups comprise the “legal left,” and they slash and rip at the fabric of the constitutional framework.

The ACLU was established in 1920 by Roger Baldwin, a Stalinist who candidly admitted: “I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately, for abolishing the state itself.”  On the Communist Party USA website, the ACLU can be found at this link:  http://www.cpusa.org/link/category/22/

When not working with and defending terrorists like Sami al-Arian, the ACLU terrorizes towns into removing Ten Commandments monuments and crosses and persecutes and intimidates Boy Scouts and law abiding Christians.  The ACLU’s Immigrant Task Force and Immigrant Rights Project are a dual driving force in the Open Borders Lobby.  Among current projects:  dissolving America’s borders, erasing all evidence of Christianity and God and requiring the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to provide free legal counsel to illegals while simultaneously demanding that illegals be provided with full welfare benefits.

The ACLU and its partner groups receive funding from a large assortment of subversive leftist funders.  Among them: Arca Foundation, Ford Foundation, George Soros Open Society Institute, Rockefeller Foundation, Woods Fund of Chicago (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The National Lawyers Guild was founded in 1936 by the Communist Party USA.  The NLG is an active affiliate of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, which served as a Soviet front group during the Cold War.  The NLG defines its mission as an effort to: “unite lawyers, law students, legal workers, and jailhouse lawyers of America (to) function as an effective political and social force…to the end that human rights shall be regarded as more sacred than property interests.”  In other words, their mission is to ‘deKulakize’ America in the name of social justice.

In 1999, NLG member Chip Berlet described a Guild ‘communist debate’ session: “The cacophony at some meetings (arises from) debates featuring…Leninist, Trotskyite, Stalinists…Maoist…Marxist, anarchists, libertarians and progressive independents…with multiple identities as lawyers, legal workers, labor organizers, tribal sovereignty activists, civil liberties and civil rights advocates, environmentalists, feminists, gay men and lesbians, and people of color.”  Chip Berlet is an activist with Morris Dees Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), another communist front group and Open Borders member.

Not coincidentally, it was the SPLC that ‘redistributed’—in the name of social justice—an Arizona ranchers’ property to some illegal aliens.  This incident was detailed in an article entitled: “Two Illegal Immigrants Win Arizona Ranch in Court,” New York Times, 8/19/05.  Dees was quoted as saying, “…it’s poetic justice that these undocumented workers own this land”

Like the ACLU, the NLG is a key member of the Open Borders Lobby.  It’s National Immigration Project consists of a network of lawyers, law students and legal workers committed to “full democratic rights for all non-citizens”---in the name of social justice. The NLG receives funding from, among others, the George Soros Open Society Institute and the Ford Foundation.  (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The last of the trio is the Center for Constitutional Rights.  It was founded in 1966 by pro-Castro attorneys Morton Stavis, Ben Smith, Arthur Kinoy, and William Kuntsler.

The CCR prides itself on using “litigation proactively to advance the law in a positive direction to guarantee the rights of those with the fewest protections.”  This is communist code for: “We subvert America’s laws.” Among those deemed by the CCR to be in need of protection are terrorist organizations, enemy combatants, and illegal immigrants.

The CCR receives funding from the Ford Foundation and George Soros Open Society Institute.  (Source:  www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

Two principal front groups, both of whom disguise their treachery as ‘civil rights,” are United for Peace and Justice and Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride.

The UFPJ is a rabidly anti-American, anti-war coalition co-chaired by committed communist Leslie Cagan.  Cagan, who worships upon Fidel Castro’s altar, was an original founder of the Committees of Correspondence, a splinter group of the Communist Party USA.  The UFPJ was created Oct. 25, 2002 in the Washington D.C. offices of People for the American Way, which played a key role in forming UFPJ.  UFPJ is a sponsoring organization of the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride.

UFPJ’s social justice agenda extends well beyond anti-war activism as it is also a pro-abortion, pro-open borders advocate that condemns nearly every aspect of American culture and our government’s foreign policy.  (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride (IWFR), another key player in the Open Borders Lobby, is supported by the ACLU and Communist Party USA.  Additionally, it has the backing of Dennis Kucinich, Howard Dean and Joe Lieberman.Among other groups listed as members of the IWFRC’s national sponsoring committee are ACORN, National Council of La Raza, National Immigration Forum, and United for Peace and Justice.

At the link below are literally hundreds of sponsors of IWFR, such as: Democratic Senators, Representatives, County Board Supervisors, Governors, town council members, radical organizations, liberalized Christian and non-Christian churches, political parties (including CPUSA and Democratic Socialists of America).

http://www.iwfr.org/endorsement.asp

Many thousands of Americans have been taken in by a myth.  The myth states that communism died when the Soviet Union imploded.  It further says that in these ‘enlightened progressive times,’ only superstition-believing McCarthyite rednecks still believe in the communist boogieman.  The myth of course, was created by New Left communists to whom seduction, deception, and psychological manipulation are the ‘rules of the game.’  Gramsci’s transformational revolution is very much alive.  It’s spreading the cancer of godless communism—the ideology from H**l—throughout the length and breadth of our culture--corrupting and decaying everything it touches.

President Ronald Reagan cautioned that: “…without God, there is no virtue because there’s no prompting of the conscience.  And without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure.  If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.”

 Americans---awaken and remember!

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

PatriotsandLiberty

http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Additional Sources

Why the Left Hates America, Daniel J. Flynn

Unholy Alliance, by David Horowitz

The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation’s Security After 9/11, by William Hawkins and Erin Anderson, FrontPageMagazine.com, Jan. 21, 2004

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.

There are two misconceptions held by many Americans.  The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded.  The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well.  “The Sixties are dead,” wrote columnist George Will (Slamming the Doors, Newsweek, Mar. 25, 1991)

Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement.  However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups.  Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay’ rights groups.  All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of subversive organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace.

Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America.  Code words by which they can be recognized are: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity.  All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.

Birth of Multiculturalism

In anticipation of the revolutionary storm that would baptize the world in an inferno of red terror, leading to its rebirth as the promised land of social justice and proletarian equality—Frederich Engels wrote, “All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm… (A general war will) wipe out all…nations, down to their very names.  The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.”  (The Magyar Struggle, Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849)

By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead.  They wondered what had gone wrong.

Separately, two Marxist theorists—Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary—concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.  The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class.  The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.”  Additionally, a new proletariat must be created.  In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history.  All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary.  He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary.  Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow, Lukacs--towards this end--launched a radical sex education program in the schools.  Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority.  All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters. 

Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

Lukacs plans were the precursor to what Cultural Marxism in the guise of SIECUS, GSLEN, and the ACLU--acting as enforcer--later brought into American schools.

In 1923, the Frankfurt School—a Marxist think-tank—was founded in Weimar Germany.  Among its founders were Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodor Adorno.  The school was a multidisciplinary effort which included sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms.  Toward this end, Marcuse—who favored polymorphous perversion—expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals.  Into this was spliced Lukacs radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics.  Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques.     The end product was Cultural Marxism, known in the West as multiculturalism.

In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno’s idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.’  This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism.  Thus, anyone who upholds America’s traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist.  Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists.  By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America’s traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.

The pernicious influence of Adorno’s ‘authoritarian personality’ idea can be clearly seen in the following quote:  “In Aug., 2003, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the results of their $1.2 million tax-payer funded study.  It stated, essentially, that traditionalists are mentally disturbed.  Scholars from the Universities of Maryland, California at Berkeley, and Stanford had determined that social conservatives…suffer from ‘mental rigidity,’ ‘dogmatism,’ and ‘uncertainty avoidance,’ together with associated indicators for mental illness.” (www.edwatch.org ‘Social and Emotional Learning” Jan. 26, 2005)   From this Orwellian quote we can see just how successful has been Gramsci’s ‘long march through the culture.’  

The corresponding and diabolically crafted corrective idea is political correctness.  The strong suggestion here is that in order for one not to be thought of as racist or fascist, then one must not only be nonjudgmental but must also embrace the ‘new’ moral absolutes: diversity, choice, sensitivity, sexual orientation, and tolerance.  Political correctness is a Machiavellian psychological ‘command and control’ device.  Its purpose is the imposition of uniformity in thought, speech, and behavior.

Critical theory is yet another psychological ‘command and control’ device.  As stated by Daniel J. Flynn, “Critical Theory, as its name implies, criticizes.  What deconstruction does to literature, Critical Theory does to societies.”  (Intellectual Morons, p 15-16) Critical Theory is an ongoing and brutal assault via vicious criticism relentlessly leveled against Christians, Christmas, the Boy Scouts, Ten Commandments, our military, and all other aspects of traditional American culture and society. 

Both political correctness and Critical Theory are in essence, psychological bullying.  They are the psycho political battering rams by which Frankfurt School disciples such as the ACLU are forcing Americans to submit to and to obey the will and the way of the Left.  These devious devices are but psychological versions of Georg Lukacs and Laventi Beria’s ‘cultural terrorism’ tactics.  In the words of Beria, “Obedience is the result of force…Force is the antithesis of humanizing actions.  It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness, lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display an inhuman attitude toward people to be granted by those people the possessions of force.” (The Russian Manual on Psychopolitics: Obedience, by Laventi Beria, head of Soviet Secret Police and Stalin’s right-hand man)

Double-thinking ‘fence-sitters’, otherwise known as moderates, centrists, and RINOs are an obvious result of these psychological ‘obedience’ techniques.  These people—afraid of incurring the wrath of name-calling obedience trainers--- have opted to straddle the fence lest they be found guilty of possessing an opinion, one way or another.  At the merest hint of displeasure from the obedience-trainers, up goes the yellow flag of surrender upon which it is boldly written: “I believe in nothing and am tolerant of everything!”

The linchpin of Cultural Marxism is cultural determinism, the parent of identity politics and group solidarity.  In its turn, cultural determinism was birthed by the Darwinian idea that man is but a soulless animal and therefore his identity is determined by for example, his skin color or his sexual and/or erotic preferences.  This proposition rejects the concepts of the human spirit, individuality, free will, and morally informed conscience (paired with personal accountability and responsibility) because it emphatically denies the existence of the God of the Bible.  Consequently, and by extension, it also rejects the first principles of our liberty enumerated in the Declaration of Independence.  These are our “unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”     Cultural Marxism must reject these because these principles of liberty “are endowed by our Creator,” who made man in His image.

Cultural determinism, states David Horowitz, is “identity politics—the politics of radical feminism, q***r revolution, and Afro-centrism—which is the basis of academic multiculturalism…a form of intellectual fascism and, insofar as it has any politics, of political fascism as well.”  (Mussolini and Neo-Fascist Tribalism: Up from Multiculturalism, by David Horowitz, Jan. 1998) 

It is said that courage is the first of the virtues because without it fear will paralyze man, thus keeping him from acting upon his moral convictions and speaking truth.  Thus bringing about a general state of paralyzing fear, apathy, and submission—the chains of tyranny—is the purpose behind psychopolitical cultural terrorism, for the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda must, at all costs, be clothed in darkness.

The antidote is courage and the light of truth.  If we are to win this cultural war and reclaim and rebuild America so our children and their children’s children can live in a ‘Shining City on the Hill’ where liberty, families, opportunity, free markets, and decency flourish, we must muster the courage to fearlessly expose the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda to the Light of Truth.    Truth and the courage to speak it will set us free.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

http://patriotsandliberty.com/
http://lindakimball.com/

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview.  Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Additional References

Slouching Toward Gomorrah, by Robert H. Bork

Intellectual Morons, by Daniel J. Flynn

Related Articles

Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2: Communist Progressive Democrats

Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left

It has been reported that Gov. Schwarzenegger caved into the persistent demands of Cultural Marxists and signed into law SB 1441. This law---a foul subversion of our Rule of Law and Constitutional rights---serves to further undermine the traditional family and parental rights by forcing extreme sex education upon children. Campaign for Children and Families in California and America (CCFAC) is outraged and appalled by Schwarzenegger’s cowardly capitulation. Schwarzenegger has “trampled the religious freedom to satisfy hyperactive sexual activists...Schwarzenegger is doing what Gray Davis did---trample religious freedom at the bidding of liberal activists from San Francisco and Hollywood. He’s not the lesser of two evils, he’s doing evil.” (Schwarzenegger Squashes Religious Freedom, Save California, 8/29/06)

American’s are increasingly puzzled, infuriated, and alarmed by the nonstop erosion of their freedoms. They want to know, “What’s going on and who are these Americans who’re working to deprive us of our rights and freedoms?”

In the “The Siege of Western Civilization,” Herb Meyers, former CIA analyst in the Reagan administration and one of the first scholars to predict the implosion of the Soviet Union, explains that there are three major threats to the survival of Western Christian-Judeo Civilization. The first of these is the war with radical Islam. The second is the incredible plunging birthrates throughout the West and Japan. We have stopped breeding, said Meyers, and this may well lead not only to destruction of the world economy, but to the extinction of entire populations. Nothing like this has ever happened before in the history of the world, declared Herb. Western Europe and Japan, said Meyers, are catastrophes simply waiting to happen. The third threat is what Meyers termed the ‘second civil war’ being waged within America by a coalition of God-hating progressive secular humanists (socialists), and Cultural Marxists (multiculturalists). As Meyers cautioned, these revolutionaries mean to overthrow and destroy the America of our Founders and its traditional Christian-Judeo based culture.

What is Communism?

In theory, communism is a classless social system in which all productive property is owned equally by the community rather than by the individual. This system therefore requires uniformity in education, food, clothing, dwellings, job, speech, thought, and even conscience. Because everything belongs to the State---including all citizens---and all social goods are to be shared equally, polymorphous sexual fluidity plays a prominent role in an aggregate of this sort. According to communist theory, a state of “social justice” will have been achieved when all individuality has been subsumed into the ‘group’ and all goods are shared equally.

History tells us that the earliest attempt at building a communist society took place in ancient Crete, around 1300 BC. This experiment inspired Lycurgus to set up a similar regime in Sparta. As Plutarch informs us, there was a uniform network consisting of education, gymnastics, and military training for youth of both sexes. Public meals and sleeping quarters were provided by the State and all land ‘fairly’ redistributed. Plutarch observed that because people themselves are viewed as property of the State, “no man was at liberty to live as he pleased, the city being like one great camp where all had their stated allowance.”

As Lycurgus was inspired by the Cretan experiment, Plato in turn, was inspired by the Lycurgus experiment. Plato’s ideal communist society would be ruled by philosopher kings and there would be “sharing of women and children among these, eugenic breeding, marriages controlled by the state, infanticide, abortion, and strictest censorship, all aimed at moulding citizens to the ideal design of his republic.” (The Theme is Freedom, M. Stanton Evans, p. 134)

In speaking of what led to the downfall of the communist Oneida Community in Oneida, New York (1848), William Hinds commented, “The first step out of communism was taken when ‘mine and thine’ were applied to husband and wife; then followed naturally an exclusive interest in children; then the desire to accumulate individual property for their present and future use.” (American Communities, Hinds, 1902)

As revealed by Hinds, the traditional family is the foundation of personal property, which is why Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, George Lukacs and comrades sought its destruction. Likewise, it’s why today’s Cultural Marxists are viciously attacking it and promoting sexually fluid alternatives such as polygamy and same-sex marriages. Additionally, since all goods are to be shared equally—even sex--- and promiscuity is, therefore, a prominent feature of secularized communal societies, Christian sexual ethics such as abstinence, fidelity, and monogamy are as antithetical as are the ideas of personal property and individual rights and freedoms.

Historically, all attempts at creating communist utopias have ended in failure. On one hand, the impossible dream of eradicating social classes has inevitably birthed totalitarian ruling classes. On the other hand, communism is quite simply, abhorrent and unnatural and people in their right minds want no part of it, which is why communists in this century have slaughtered in excess of 100 million people in their insanely evil quest to force this catastrophically unnatural system upon people…for their own good, of course. Seen in this light, the utopian ideal has been one of most vilely destructive fantasies to ever have infected the mind of men.

Who are the Enemy Combatants?

Worshippers of the communist principle (Cultural Marxists and secular humanists) are the enemy combatants who, while posing as patriotic Americans, are by deed waging a second civil war against the America of our Founders and traditional values Americans. With their disguises removed and their contemptible goals revealed it becomes clear as to why traditional marriage and Christianity are under a brutally relentless assault. It likewise focuses the light of truth upon the underlying motivation of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit who lashed out at parents on Nov. 2, 2005. In the ruling handed down by these black-robed totalitarians, it was declared that the upbringing of children, “does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door…There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children (and) parents have no due process or privacy right to override determinations of public schools…” These despots, who view children as chattel of the State and parents as sperm/egg donors, emphasized that the parents, “fundamental right to control the education of their children is…substantially diminished.” (Judicial Supremacists Lash Out at Parents, Phyllis Schlafly Report, Eagleforum, 2005)

America’s b****** children—Cultural Marxists and progressive secular humanists—are following the strategic plan for the overthrow of America that was designed by Marxist theoreticians such as George Lukacs and Antonio Gramsci of the Frankfurt Institute, a Marxist think-tank. According to plan, revolutionaries are dechristianizing America and sexualizing and dumbing-down her children while simultaneously encouraging kids to rebel against their parents. They are subverting the Rule of Law and Constitution, undermining national security and weapons-defense systems, working to erase our borders, preventing the US from drilling for much needed oil, colluding with Islamofascists, and provoking unassimilated immigrants into open rebellion. Additionally, they have created the abomination of special rights groups whose ‘special rights’ are enforced by quota systems, psychopolitical ‘sensitivity and diversity training’, Stalinist speech codes and fascist hate-crime laws. All of the aforementioned lend themselves to the disintegration of society and the unleashing of chaos…necessary prerequisites for revolution.

.

Until the advent of Christ---creator of mankind and Author of individual and political freedom--- history was essentially a dog-eat-dog world. It was a ‘survival of the fittest’ world in which the common man dwelt in fear and submission to his government. Power flowed from the gods and goddesses to predatory kings, emperors, and monarchs and then they did whatever they wanted and told the people what they could or could not have in terms of freedoms and privileges.

The greatest revolution in the history of the world--- the American Revolution--- radically changed the tyrannical ‘top-down’ model. America’s Revolution led to the creation of something wholly unique---a Constitutional Republic where power flowed from God---our Creator---to all of the people, hence the term, “we the people.” Nowhere in the world but in America do “we the people”---empowered by our Creator---tell the government what it is allowed to do.

It’s in the Genesis account---where God made man in His own image and gave him dominion over the earth---where the all important and immutable first principles of life and liberty come from. In the Declaration of Independence these principles are expressed thusly, “that all people are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights…among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

These immutable first principles are exposited upon and made secure by the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Rule of Law. Our rights and liberties---when rightly exercised within the limitations of moral discipline--- lead to the creation of a dynamic, prosperous society in which decency, safety, families, free markets, innovation, and creativity flourish for the good of all.

“The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were…the general principles of Christianity…those general principles…are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and that those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature.” (Works, Vol. x. pp.45-46, Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813)

On behalf of a phantasmagorical utopia that exists only within the collective mind of the chronically disconnected-from-reality Left, Cultural Marxists and their allies---both national and international—are waging an all-out revolution to overturn the American Revolution and thereby destroy the America bequeathed to us by our Founders.

The wholesale destruction of the highest, most advanced form of civilization the world has ever seen is happening because, “We’ve forgotten what Western civilization is,” said Meyers, “we no longer teach it in the schools.” “Our culture is Western Civilization. This is who we are,” explained Herb Meyers. “We need to understand what Western Civilization is all about, such as the rule of law, human rights, and economic liberty, and above all we need to teach this to our children.

Western Civilization is completely bound to our Creator. He it is who endows us with our inalienable individual rights and liberties. Thus it is of the highest priority that we not only prevent Cultural Marxists and their atheist brethren---some of whom are even on the Right-- from finishing the job of severing Christianity from our government and culture---as they’ve so insidiously done--- but that we repair the damage done by them. For if they succeed in finishing the job, Western Civilization will end and brutal tyranny unlike anything the world has yet experienced will commence.

Let us heed the prophetic advice of Daniel Webster who cautioned, “Hold on my friends to the Constitution and the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster and what has happened once in 6000 years may not happen again. Hold onto the Constitution, for if the American constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.”

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

http://lindakimball.com/

Linda Kimball is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, worldview, and politics. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Related Articles by Linda:

Gay Totalitarians “Polymorphously Perverse” Sex Education for Kids

Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

The New Left, Cultural Marxism, and Psychopolitics Disguised as Multiculturalism

Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left